Wednesday, December 22, 2010
The great writer and teacher Vernon Howard once said, “Human sickness is so severe that few can bare to look at it, but those who do will become well.” I often wonder, as I wander through a crowd of half-retarded, diseased people, if this sickness is something most people repress in their minds, or if they themselves are so aloof, so accustomed to it, they don’t even notice it. For me, it’s not just something I’m reminded of from time to time; it’s something that, perhaps because of my current environment, I find impossible to ignore. It is all around me.
Perhaps what Howard meant when he said that by observing the sickness one becomes well is that you see the causes of this sickness in the way others live their lives, and you endeavor to be alive, to be awake, to be well by not mimicking the behavior. If that’s so, then it is something I connect with on a very deep level.
Perhaps Jiddu Krishnamurti meant something similar when he said, “It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” There is no doubt that this society is profoundly sick, and it is not a society I want to be well adjusted to. Most people, unable or unwilling to see the sickness, would find one’s desire to disconnect from society to be a form of mental illness, but for me it is the only way I can ever become well.
Of course there are many who have disconnected from society and were, perhaps coincidentally or perhaps not, a few cards short of a deck. Ted Kaczynski comes to mind, although few know he was a product of a CIA mind control experiment known as MKUltra. I digress. Were they crazy because they were truly crazy, or crazy simply because they broke away from the hive and refused to conform?
But the sickness is all around me. As I walk down the hallway at my job; as I go to the supermarket; as I watch TV. I walk by people who are morbidly obese, often so obese they’re using scooters to cart themselves around, or using a cane to walk, carrying around obtrusive cellulite that can only be described as unnatural looking. They carry their lungs around with them in oxygen tanks. Even if they’re not heinously fat, almost everyone has a look of emptiness in their eyes, their mouths hanging open; awake physically but mentally, spiritually, completely unconscious. Welcome to Costco, I love you. On the off chance that I’m actually watching TV – on a break at work, or at a relative’s house (I disconnected my cable) – the advertisements are so utterly idiotic, I feel myself dumber by watching them. The message almost never is, this is why you should buy this product. The message is, it’s awesome to be retarded. You relate this this retardedness, and so you want to buy their product. If there's more to it than that, I don't get it.
I feel in no way superior to these people. I understand that they are victims of a very effective, coordinated, and sophisticated social engineering program, where they are slowly chemically lobotomized from the time they are born, given a worthless education where subservience and obedience and hive mentality is indoctrinated into them, taught to worship celebrity, and revel in ignorance, distraction, and trivium. I understand the psychology behind this, that their ego identities have been very carefully crafted, so that anyone who thinks differently than them are severely ostracized, and anyone who tries to point all of this out to them, no matter how thoroughly and elegantly, is laughed at and ridiculed, their egos only empowered by their sense of superiority over the kooks and the conspiracy theorists and the America haters, now commonly referred to as domestic terrorists.
I’ve now come to the point where I understand what Gandhi meant when he said, “Be the change you wish to see in the world.” It’s similar to what Jesus meant when he said, “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?” Yes, society is sick. Yes, people are diseased. Yes, they deserve to be healthy, alive, and free. But who can provide this for them if not themselves? I think the people, whether they believe this or not, have had enough of other people living their own lives for them. And besides, as H.L. Mencken said, “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” Isn’t this what has brought us to this sorry state in the first place? People wishing to rule others; others demanding that someone rule them, save them. And do you truly wish to save them, or is it an unconscious desire to make yourself feel superior by demonstrating how much more you know than they do?
Further, we in the truth movement (whatever that is) are fond of insisting that people see what is apparently so very obvious and hidden in plain sight; but if this is so, why do those we think are asleep need anyone to point it out to them? And who appointed you the representative for all that is true and just? Sure, people deserve truth. They deserve freedom. They deserve life. All sentient beings do. I don’t mean to inundate this treatise with quotes from other people, but, said Voltaire, “It is hard to free fools from the chains they revere.” And that is the genius of this scientific dictatorship: the elite have devised a system where not only do the slaves willingly install their own yokes, but they love being slaves; they defend their slavery like a wounded mother bear.
It is difficult to arrive at the conclusion that fighting the system involves a certain level of enslavement to it. How can fighting for freedom paradoxically involve making you a slave? You are taught that fighting tyranny is your heritage, your American lifeblood. But the elite have co-opted our republic and slowly replaced it with a system that, while appearing to be the same, is actually cleverly designed to make the people think they still have the power, the control, and the choice, whereas only the illusion of choice exists. The more you fight, the more inured you become within the system, because the people in power do not hold public office. You cannot elect new leaders who will better represent you. You only elect the puppets for the ones with the real control: the banksters who literally own the global money supply. Those of us in the know understand that every dollar in existence is debt; you may be holding it, you may think you’ve earned it, but it is owed to the institution that created it and loaned it out at interest. People know this, particularly those in the End the Fed movement, and yet they somehow feel that it is possible to annihilate their oligarchy by voting the right people in, who will inevitably become a servant of the printing press, or be destroyed, even murdered.
If you wish to continue participating in this slave farm, that of course is your right. As obvious as I personally think this criminal matrix is, I again must ask myself: if it’s that obvious, why don’t more people see it? How can I make someone see something that should be as clear as the sun or the full moon in the sky? Indeed I cannot. The more I demand they do, the more hardened their ego becomes; the less likely they will be willing to see, and the more my own ego will become dominant, as I develop a false sense of superiority over other “less enlightened” people. As Jeremiah says, they have eyes but do not see. Read: do not see, not can not see. And so, understanding Gandhi, understanding Jesus, I take my life, and my life alone, into my own hands, and I walk. I do not know where I will end up. All I know is, it will be someplace far from the sight of human sickness, or at least someplace where involvement in this profoundly sick society is kept to a minimum. This is not out of hatred, or disgust, but simply for my own personal peace of mind and wellness. I would do more for others if I could, but the horse, though led to the water, is not obliged to drink it.
I would give the same advice to you, without demanding you heed, without questioning your sense if you do not. Your life is the only life you have any control over, and you are the only one who has any real control over your life. Even if your urge to save humanity isn’t a false front for the urge to control people, it not only strengthens the ego of those you think you are trying to save, attempting to shatter a paradigm they’ve been comfortable in, indeed addicted to, their entire lives, but the false sense of superiority you inevitably feel by “knowing better” than they do will only strengthen your own ego as well, and the ego is the antithesis of consciousness. I wish to cultivate my true nature, to nourish consciousness, and thus diminish suffering and evil in the world. May all of us, as individuals, become conscious, and experience the peace, freedom, and tranquility that inevitably come with it. Then, as individuals, we will realize that we are not really individuals, not separate, but are One.
Friday, November 26, 2010
These are the issues in life that, to me, represent true fulfillment, growth, and power. The keepers of the establishment faith, no matter if it's spiritual, scientific, or social, are lying to us, and purposely keeping us in darkness and ignorance as to who and what we are, who or what "god" is, and what our origins are - where we've come from, where we're going. The established order, having held power over us for so long, up until recently with so little effort, because they thought they figured out the secrets of the human mind, are desperately trying to keep us in ignorance and mental bondage. There are forces at play that are beyond their control so that, as they tighten their grip on us, like a handful of sand, we slip right through their fingers.
The more one learns about the secrets that are being withheld from us, the truths that are being hidden, the more one understands the motives involved. If we believe we are small, and powerless, we will seek answers and guidance from external sources; we will demand to be ruled. We will put our lives in the hands of others, and comfort ourselves in the ignorance of complete and utter lack of control. Jesus take the wheel. It’s in God’s hands. If we are taught to fear death, we will do anything asked of us so we can be secure. We will seek out enemies to destroy, usually imagined, and cheer as someone else destroys them for us. Feeling weak and ignorant and frightened, we enslave ourselves with little expenditure of energy and resources on the part of our masters.
What are we? Where did we come from? Where are we going? These are questions that establishment faith and society and science have failed miserably in answering, likely willfully, yet these are questions that we must discover the answers to if we are ever to be free from our bondage.
The origins of man and civilization, at least as told by establishment archaeology, are a myth. The first and probably greatest fallacy that perpetuates this myth is Darwin's theory of linear evolution, which tells us that the earlier into history one delves, the more primitive civilization must - must - invariably be. Therefore when geologists, for example, determine that the Sphinx, as evident by rainwater erosion patterns in the limestone it was carved out of, must be more than twice the age given to it by establishment scientists, so-called "Egyptologists" scoff at the notion, grounded in real science though it may be. "Where is the rest of this civilization?" they ignorantly ask, as if it's the responsibility of the geologist to explain how scientific fact fits in with archaeological theory. Similarly, Robert Bauval has shown that the alignment of the Giza pyramids with the belt stars in the constellation Orion give a date far older – more than 7,000 years older – than 2450 BCE. "Where is the rest of this civilization?" How about the entire Giza necropolis? The "evidence" attributing the Great Pyramid to the 4th Dynasty pharaoh Khufu is so blatantly fraudulent it's a disgrace to the field of Egyptology that this is accepted dogma. Are they just wrong, or are they lying? And if they are lying, why?
What cannot be denied, even by lying Egyptologists, is the fact that, despite the so-called linear nature of human evolution, Egyptian civilization was at its peak very near its beginnings, and then slowly declined and decayed as the years progressed. Never is it considered how these people, supposedly having one foot in the hunter-gatherer aeon, could have walked out of their caves and climbed down from the trees and immediately discovered the knowledge not only to move massive, 50 to 100 ton stone megaliths over long distances allegedly before the wheel was even invented, not only to lift these massive blocks of limestone and granite hundreds of feet into the air, but to set them in place astrologically, geodetically, geometrically, and mathematically perfect. Their measurements were so flawless that modern engineers would be loathe to duplicate the feat, and with equipment supposedly 4,500 years more advanced than the Egyptians. This is more than a logical fallacy; it's a logical absurdity.
The appearance of civilizations at their peak, followed by a slow decline into darkness, is not a feature exclusive to Egypt. The Mayans, the Incans, the Sumerians, and many other civilizations, all mysteriously began at the peak of their civilization, and, no matter how old a civilization was, plunged into a dark age at essentially the same time. War, famine, disease, decay, were a common feature all over the world; no one was spared. What was the cause of this? If evolution is linear, shouldn’t the Egyptians have expanded their glory? Shouldn’t the Greek and Roman civilizations not fallen into decay? Ditto the Mayans, the Europeans, the Arabs, Chinese, Incans, etc?
New discoveries by serious archaeologists and scientists in other fields are showing that not only is Egypt much older than is believed, but that there were likely much older civilizations before them, which they and the aforementioned civilizations inherited their knowledge from. How old is civilization, really? What happened to these peoples, and why has their knowledge and accomplishments been lost?
Almost all ancient civilizations, though supposedly having no connection to each other, no way of communicating, feature very similar themes and symbolism in their so-called mythologies. One feature commonly found is knowledge, expressed symbolically and allegorically, of an imperceptibly slow motion of the stars known as precession of the equinoxes. Each year on the Autumnal equinox the sun rises in a certain constellation of the Zodiac. The transition from one constellation to the next takes approximately 2000 years, with the precession showing a one-degree shift in the sky every 72 years, or 56 arc seconds per year (56 arc seconds is about half the width of a toothpick held out at arms-length). The precession of the equinox through all 12 Zodiac constellations takes approximately 24,000 years. How could such primitive people have knowledge of this cosmic clock, which takes hundreds of thousands of lifetimes to traverse? How would they know it’s a cycle, if their civilizations had not been around long enough to observe it? Just how long were these astrological effects known of and observed? Why, and how, could this cosmological clock, as the ancients believed, affect the rise and fall of civilizations, and shifts in human consciousness between enlightenment and ignorance?
Throughout the millennia, all cultures applied allegories and symbols describing precession into their religions, myths and mysteries. The initiated and the wise viewed these stories as such; the laymen took them literally. This allowed the initiated to have great power and control over the layman; so it was in ancient times, so it is today. For even in modern religions, which we take to be more evolved and enlightened than the primitive and silly myths of the past, we see that the core beliefs are grounded in the same astrological allegory and symbolism. This is beyond the scope of this essay to document in detail, so I will provide a single profound example.
Jesus Christ was born just as the sun was passing from the age or "house" of Aries and into the age or "house" of Pisces in the precession of the equinoxes. On December 24th, just before dawn, look to the eastern horizon. There you will see the constellation Orion, with its three prominent belt stars. Follow the belt stars down to the star Sirius, the brightest star in the sky. Continue this line further and it points directly to where the sun will rise. The three kings (Orion’s belt) follow the star in the east (Sirius) to Jesus (the sun). The name Bethlehem literally translates into “house of bread”; “house” being the Zodiac sign the sun resides in for each 2,000 age. House of bread is another name given for the constellation Virgo, the virgin, who is usually shown holding a sheath of wheat. And so, Jesus was born of a virgin. On December 25th the sun is in the constellation Capricorn, the lamb: Jesus is the Lamb of God.
Jesus, the light of the world ... the light of life (John 8:12), represents the sun as it is “born” on or around December 25th, grows to adulthood, and then dies again in darkness on the Winter Solstice. This is why Jesus’ ministry, accompanied by his 12 “apostles” (signs of the Zodiac), lasts only a year. After the Summer Solstice, the sun moves further south each day, shortening the amount of sunlight and causing colder temperatures and the eventual death of all that is green and beautiful. The sun reaches its lowest point, or “dies”, on the Winter Solstice. At this point it resides in the area of the Crux, or cross, constellation, where it remains, at least perceivably, for 3 days, and then begins moving north again, signaling longer days, warmer weather, and the return to life. The sun of god died on the cross, was dead for three days, and then rose again. The cross you see on church steeples or jewelry is actually a pagan symbol for the cross of the Zodiac, with each line representing the equinoxes and the solstices, and the four seasons. Christianity is nothing more than a pagan astrological allegory. And not very original at that.
- [Bacchus (Dionysos)] was born of a virgin on the 25th of December; he performed great miracles for the good of mankind; particularly one in which he changed water into wine; he rode in a triumphal procession on an ass; he was put to death by the Titans, and rose again from the dead on the 25th of March: he was always called the Saviour. In his mysteries, he was shown to the people, as an infant is by the Christians at this day, on Christmas Day morning in Rome. - Ovid's Metamorphosis
As mentioned, Jesus represents the sun as it resides in the "house", or Zodiac sign, of Pisces, the fish. This is why fish symbolism is featured in Christian allegory. Jesus feeds the 5000 with five loaves of bread and two fish. Jesus befriends two fishermen. When Jesus tells his apostles, “I am with you always, even unto the end of the world,” (Matthew 28:20 (KJV)) the word world is a mistranslation. The proper word is aeon, or age. Jesus, the personification of the sun in the house of Pisces, will be with us until that age passes into the new one. What is the new age? In Mark 14:13, when one of Jesus’ apostles asks him where the final Passover feast will be held, he answers, “Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: follow him (into the house he enters).” The man bearing the pitcher of water is of course Aquarius; they will enter the house where the sun will dwell in the next age. This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. Catchy tune. You probably never knew what they were talking about.
You can imagine the power the Church and other keepers of the faith would be robbed of were the followers of Christianity to discover these truths (and, miraculously, believe them). Imagine the chaos that would ensue were people to discover they had nothing to fear of Satan or hell or God’s wrath. Chaos for the powers that be, not for the rest of humanity. This is what’s laughable about those people (usually Christians) who hysterically claim that the global power elite want to destroy religion in favor of pantheism/Gaia worship. Nothing keeps people in fear and in control more effectively than organized religion – one-third of the global population adhering to Catholicism and Islam alone.
Where does all of this leave the question of “God” or the Creator? The deeper spiritual questions can only be discovered by the individual, and for my part my view of “God” will tie into everything I’m saying before you’re done reading.
- Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do! - J.P. Morgan
How could the precession of Zodiac signs through our sky over many thousands of years affect the rise and fall of human civilization? Aren’t we taught by the leading minds of our so-called enlightened society that astrology is a mundane and antiquated mythology that can’t possibly have any basis in scientific fact? But astrology is grounded in science, in ways we often take for granted. The spinning of the Earth causes night and day. The Earth’s orbit around the sun, coupled with the tilting of its axis, causes night and day to become longer and shorter, along with the seasons of the year. And it is a scientific fact that the full moon has an effect on human consciousness.
Perhaps it is not the sun’s position in different houses of the Zodiac on the Autumnal equinox that effects the consciousness of man, but the astrological mechanism that causes precession itself. The keepers of the scientific faith tell us that precession is caused by the subtle wobbling of the Earth due to gravitational pulls within the solar system, namely the sun and the moon. But the mathematics behind this have never added up, leaving the theory open to easy debunking by anyone who bothers to examine it. Yet the dogma persists, and the keepers of the faith would have you believe it’s not really that important anyway.
- As long as you still experience the stars as something above you, you still lack a viewpoint of knowledge. – Friedrich Nietzsche
The overwhelming majority of stars in the universe are part of at least a binary pair. Groundbreaking research by Walter Cruttenden and the Binary Research Institute are amassing evidence that, aside from their thorough debunking of the luna-solar precession theory, show that our sun is very likely in a binary orbit with another celestial body. It has not yet been determined what this body is, since it has yet to be observed directly. Many ancient cultures claimed to be aware that our sun orbited another body – the Sumerians called this star Nibiru (also Neberu) – and there are many celestial objects that have significant mass yet are difficult to see (black holes, for instance).
- Neberu is [Marduk’s] star which is bright in the sky. He controls the crossroads; they must look to him, saying, “He who kept crossing inside Tiamat without respite, Shall have Neberu as his name, grasping her middle. May he establish the paths of the heavenly stars, and may he Sheppard all the gods like sheep. – Enuma Elish, Tablet VII
Our 24,000 year orbit around this body causes the precession of the equinoxes. It is not the particular position of the sun relative to Zodiac signs in and of itself that causes the rise and fall of civilization, but the sun’s (and thus the Earth’s) position within its orbit around its celestial companion. All objects in the universe have an electromagnetic field, as well as their own characteristic frequencies based on their proportions and velocities, characteristics that make all celestial bodies and even the universe itself conscious entities. This is difficult to imagine because when we think of an organism we tend to anthropomorphize it, giving it human or animal qualities. But the definition of an organism is any object that can react to stimuli, reproduce, grow, and maintain homeostasis. Our planet, our solar system, our galaxy, and the entire universe all function in this way. So do the sun, the Earth, our moon, and our theoretical companion star. Because our bodies and our minds have their own characteristic frequencies and electromagnetic fields, it should be expected that as we, on the Earth, orbit the sun, traveling the cosmos, orbiting not only the galactic center but also our theoretical solar companion, the shifts in the electromagnetic fields and frequencies we encounter cause shifts in consciousness. History bears this out.
The Hindu Vedass referred to this cycle as the Yuga cycle. Plato called it the Great Year. Both divided the 24,000-year cycle into 4 ages, or yugas. The Golden Age, or Satya Yuga, lasts 9,600 years, followed by the descending 3,600 year Silver Age/Treta Yuga, the descending 2,400 year Bronze Age/Dwapara Yuga, until at the bottom of the cycle we reach the 2,400 year Iron Age or Kali Yuga. Then begins the ascending Bronze/Dwapara and Silver/Treta ages, until the cycle begins anew with the Golden Age/Satya Yuga (see image, right).
The existence of a worldwide Dark Age, where ignorance, ego, materialism, war, famine and disease dominated consciousness and civilization, is an uncontested historical fact. Yet for some reason, all mentions of golden ages or ages of great enlightenment, when men were like gods, and lived extended lives in peace and harmony with each other and with nature, are dismissed as primitive mythology. But when we look at the chronology of the Great Year/Yuga cycle, the Dark Ages correspond perfectly, with the bottom of the Iron/Kali age occurring at about 500 CE, smack in the middle of the Dark Ages.
Determining if mankind was in the midst of a Golden Age which ended 8,000 years ago (before the established origins of human civilization) brings us back to the beginning of this essay. We know civilization is much older; we know that the ancients, in many ways, were even more advanced than we are today. You will never see these now proven facts in an establishment textbook, and yet the science is there; the evidence is irrefutable. How advanced were they, and why does so little of this advanced civilization remain?
This question returns us to the fallacy of Darwin’s theory of linear evolution, which tells us that civilization, no matter how old it really is, will by default be more primitive the further into history one delves. Even without overwhelming evidence to the contrary, this theory supposes that there are no physical or metaphysical variables involved in the equation; clearly this is not the case. For as mentioned even establishment archaeology cannot deny the fact that many of the great civilizations of the ancient world appeared at their peak. Linear evolution would suggest that, however this miracle was accomplished, these civilizations would only continue to advance, not decay and decline, as the inconvenient and irrefutable history shows.
Along with precession, almost all ancient creation myths, though originating from diverse cultures supposedly not connected (the Sumerians and the Olmec/Mayans, for example) mention global, extinction-level catastrophes, most notably the deluge commonly read from the book of Genesis in the Bible. So it can be safely assumed that this event occurred at least once. What was the cause? We can never attribute these to a singular cause, because we can never know for sure if it was a singular event, or occurred multiple times. Ancient texts show this was likely the case. It is possible, for example, that a salt-water planet found between Mars and Jupiter (where an asteroid belt currently resides, mysteriously never forming a planet), known as Tiamat or Phaeton was somehow destroyed, causing much of the planet’s water to rain down on Earth. However the theory I find most plausible is Charles H Hapgood’s crustal displacement theory.
Crustal displacement, or Earth crust displacement, can best be summed up simply by quoting Albert Einstein, who endorsed the theory by writing the foreword to Hapgood’s book, The Earth’s Shifting Crust. Einstein tells us
- In a polar region there is a continual deposition of ice, which is not symmetrically distributed about the pole. The Earth's rotation acts on these unsymmetrically deposited masses [of ice], and produces centrifugal momentum that is transmitted to the rigid crust of the Earth. The constantly increasing centrifugal momentum produced in this way will, when it has reached a certain point, produce a movement of the Earth's crust over the rest of the Earth's body, and this will displace the polar regions toward the equator.
Currently there is a massive imbalance in Polar ice, as the northern ice sheet remains relatively unchanged, while massive amounts of ice are being dumped onto the land mass of Antarctica at the South Pole. As this collection of ice amasses year after year at the South Pole, the Earth’s mass is thrown off balance, until eventually, as has been postulated to have happened before, the mass of ice will shift towards the equator, dragging the crust along with it and changing the latitudes of all the continents of the world. Some say this event is imminent. I personally don't agree. However the evidence it has occured before is strong.
Establishment history tells us of a massive, worldwide ice age that ended many thousands of years ago. It always vexed me how, on this planet Earth that, as far as we can tell, has the exact same orbit it did back then, global temperatures could have dropped to such an extreme for such a long period of time.
For while the glaciers “advanced” from the North Pole down to the middle of North America (known as the Wisconsin Glaciation), on the opposite side of the world, Siberia – a land today associated with harsh, unforgiving cold – was bathed in temperate, even sub-tropical conditions. We know this because, found in the permafrost, are animals and plants known to inhabit such regions; animals such as humans, saber tooth tigers, and the mammoth, which have been found flash frozen so quickly that the food remains in their stomachs undigested to this day.
How could their environment go from temperate/sub-tropical to harsh arctic so quickly as to kill these creatures in their tracks (they are so well preserved that people actually eat them)? Establishment geologists make no attempt to rectify this enigma; like all anomalies that do not fit into the established paradigm (rainwater erosion patterns on the Great Spinx, etc.), they are swept under the carpet. The ignorance and blind stupidity that allowed mankind to languish in the belief that the Earth was at the center of the universe, despite all evidence to the contrary (and despite this being a relatively new theory, for the ancients knew the Earth revolved around the sun), for over a thousand years, still persists in modern times. Or is it not ignorance, but blatant deception that is at play here?
Crustal displacement explains this anomaly quite simply. The ice age of many thousands of years ago never ended; it is taking place exactly where it always has: at the poles. It is not the ice sheets that moved, but the crust that shifted. Herein lies our explanation for the deluge. For such a shift would move uncountable tons of ice out of the arctic regions and into temperate and sub-tropical regions, causing the ice to melt far faster than it could re-accumulate on the new lands occupying the poles. Disaster ensues; entire civilizations, including one that likely existed on Antarctica, which would have been in temperate and sub-tropical regions prior to the shift, are destroyed, either by the slow accumulation of ice a mile thick on top of all their former glory, great earthquakes, the eruption of a "thousand Krakatoas at once", or the flood waters that sunk entire city states. This incidentally explains why, before Antarctica was officially “discovered” in the 1800’s, Ottoman cartographers possessed maps of Antarctica as it would appear without ice long before technology existed to make such a map. Many erroneously attribute this to some type of alien ice-penetrating mapping technology, but crustal shift is a more plausible explanation.
Could it be that the survivors of this “lost” continent (often referred to as Atlantis or Lemuria) fled to Egypt, Sumer, South and Central America, the British Isles, etc, and attempted to re-establish themselves, but without much of the knowledge, technology, and resources lost in this massive catastrophic event? Is this why Egyptian, Olmec, Incan, and Sumerian, et al, civilization arose at their peak, and then degenerated? Perhaps these are the attempts of a remnant of a destroyed and scattered civilization to rebuild itself. Is this why these various, supposedly unconnected cultures, long before sea travel is supposed to have been invented, shared many elements of symbolism, mythology, astronomy, and architecture? Is this why all of them universally speak of a golden age, or first time, as the Egyptians referred to it, where mankind lived longer, in harmony with nature, and possessed god-like powers and consciousness? Ancient Egyptian texts describe the “goddess” Isis moving massive blocks of stone by the power of her voice alone. Was the “technology” of the ancients a heightened consciousness; a mind more in tune with the nature of things, understanding matter, energy, and reality itself?
- Reality is an illusion, albeit a persistent one. – Albert Einstein
It is perhaps only because of discoveries in the field of quantum mechanics that we are free to ask such questions, though the keepers of the establishment faith – thoroughly discredited – hate it. Our masters want you to believe you are small, weak, and helpless, confined to the body you inhabit, and that reality is bound to your perception of it through the five senses. This is what David Icke has termed the five-sense conspiracy: the lie that reality only exists as you are able to perceive it. The establishment cannot stop our evolving awareness, as it passes into the ascending ages, discovering the relationship between reality and consciousness. Our companion star is drawing nearer to periapsis (the point at which an orbiting object is closest to the body it is orbiting), strengthening our interaction with its frequencies and electromagnetic field. Nothing can stop this.
Among the most important scientific discoveries ever is the measurement problem of quantum mechanics, also known as the observer effect. Scientific observation has shown that a sub-atomic particle only appears in a particular place when it is observed. To put it more simply, if you are not looking at an electron, for example, it is a wave of infinite possibilities. The simple act of observing it – the conscious act of measuring it – turns the electron into a particle. It’s not that the other infinite possibilities disappear; they exist in one of the infinite alternate realities where everything that can happen does happen in alternate universes (reality truly is stranger than fiction!). Reality does not exist out there, independent of the observer. It exists only in your mind.
- The conscious mind is a spin doctor ... not the commander in chief. - Steven Pinker
Ultimately the first and perfectly logical question that arises is, “If I’m creating reality in my mind, and everyone else is creating reality in their minds, how do we all experience the same reality simultaneously?” This question only makes sense within the current paradigm perpetrated by the keepers of the establishment order. This paradigm is a lie, that each of us is separate. How easy to conquer our minds if they are subjected to such division. To begin, it must be understood that the conscious mind only perceives and controls about 5% of your reality. That means that 95% of what's going on around you and in your mind is unknown to you. You are perceiving, you are creating, reality and you're completely unaware of it.
So what if we are all one consciousness, experiencing reality subjectively? What if the entire universe is one consciousness – all of it: the ether, the plasma, the energy, the matter, the planets and all life on all of them, the stars, the galaxies…everything? The quantum mechanical concept of entanglement shows us we are indeed connected. If two elementary particles are born from the same process, no matter how far away these two particles are removed from each other – even to opposite ends of the universe – what happens to one particle directly and immediately affects the other. This of course defies Einstein's law of the speed limit of the universe – the speed of light – and can only be explained if the space between the two particles does not exist because the two are not two but are in fact one. Now consider the universe, and everything in it. Every atom, every wave of energy, has one common origin: the Big Bang, out of which all that is arose. Therefore by this principle, everything created by that singular event is bound by the entanglement principle. We are in fact one.
It seems absurd because we think reality exists only as our five senses – what the Buddha referred to as the five hindrances – perceive it. Relativity and quantum mechanics shows that matter and energy are interchangable, that what we view as tangible and solid are actually illusory. The atom, and, we are discovering, sub-atomic particles composing the atom, are almost entirely empty space. And besides, how else do we reconcile the observer effect? How can we each as individuals create one reality that we all – including the animals and even plants and single-celled organisms – experience the same? Without consciousness, everything we see (and cannot see, which constitutes the overwhelming majority of the universe) would be nothing but a fog of infinite possibilities. Not a theory; observable scientific fact.
- Know, O man, that Light is thine heritage. Know that darkness is only a veil. Sealed in thine heart is brightness eternal, waiting the moment of freedom to conquer, waiting to rend the veil of the night. - Thoth, Fourth Emerald Tablet
The implications of this are astounding, and it is a truth the establishment powers are desperate to keep you from knowing. You are God. Not the “God” concept you have in your head, which is an allegorical concept never meant to be taken literally: this concept you have of an anthropomorphized deity figure, the bearded man in the sky who created the universe and watches everything you do, judging your life as you live it, dealing out punishment and reward for sinners and the saved. You are one with the universal consciousness that composes everything that is. You are one with your fellow man, one with all living things, one with all inanimate objects, one with the Earth, the moon, the sun, the planets, the galaxy, the universe; one is all and all is one. This is what (not who) "God" is. Give it whatever name you like.
As the cycle of the ages progresses and we move closer to a new Golden Age, the imagination teems with visions of what’s possible. Currently we only apply a meager percentage of our mind’s capabilities to our everyday existence. What will we be capable of as we are thrust into enlightenment, as we become more aware of who we are and what our place in the universe is, and the nature of reality and of consciousness? Perhaps, like the "goddess" Isis, we’ll be able to move massive objects simply by the command of our voice.
- Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you. – Matthew, 17:20
Perhaps we’ll be able to speak without words.
- The LORD said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.” – Genesis 11:6-7
Maybe, as the Buddhists believe, we will remember the past lives we lived in ignorance, and, finally, reveling in the glow of perfect enlightenment, find amusement at how blind we once were.
- One step thou has gained on the long pathway upward, infinite now is the mountain of Light. Each step thou taketh but heightens the mountain; all of thy progress but lengthens the goal. Approach ye ever the infinite Wisdom, ever before thee recedes the goal. - Thoth, Second Emerald Tablet
The subjects covered here are far beyond the scope of a single essay. Not only have I read many books and articles covering these topics, as always, knowledge is a road traveled on, not a destination. I have more to learn, more to understand, and many, many veils to remove. Your path will be different, but seek truth, seek knowledge, not so that you may gain power over men, but because knowledge and wisdom and light is your birthright, your heritage.
The old established orders, the religious, social and scientific dogmas, are an antiquated and cruel remnant of a time when man dwelt in ignorance. Participation in and attempting to facilitate these institutions in an effort to perfect them only perpetuates our bondage. As human consciousness elevates, we will discover that the only way to prepare for what's to come is to purify the spirit. May we all discover this sooner, rather than later.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
When most Americans hear someone like me say FDR purposely provoked Japan and knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor beforehand, or that the Gulf of Tonkin was staged (declassified and irrefutable), they immediately become insulted, because their false sense of patriotism is part of their identity, and an attack on the good name and integrity of the United States is a slap in their very own face.
But let me go back to the beginning. Way back to the beginning. Ever since “civilization” conceived the concept of a conquering army, men have dreamed of being the sole rulers of all the world. Some have come close to achieving this feat – would that Alexander the Great had lived to old age (he died at 32), who knows what the extent of his conquest might have been. But, alas for the conquerors, conquest is only the first and usually the easiest step in empire building, and the cost, manpower and logistics of keeping an over-bloated empire is always unsustainable. And thus, even if Alexander had lived to conquer every square inch of the known world, his empire would’ve eventually crumbled.
You see, people just will not be slaves, or at least they will not be slaves when they know they’re slaves; when they can feel the yoke around their neck, the boot on their face. It took many, many centuries for seekers of world domination to come to this realization.
Meanwhile, a system of banking began to emerge which enabled bankers to exponentially increase their profits through legal fraud. Known as fractional reserve lending, it essentially allowed bankers to loan out more money, at interest, than they had in assets and capital. Your bank does this today: go to your bank and, if you’re able, request a withdrawal of $100,000 in cash. See how far that gets you. You put the cash into their bank; why don't they have it? I digress. Eventually the banksters learned that if they could carry out this fraud on a national or international scale, their power would be god-like and they would be invincible.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild is credited apocryphally with saying that if he could gain control of a nation’s money, he wouldn’t care who made its laws. Whether he said this or not, this is the sinister foundation of central banking: a private cartel of banksters with complete control of the value and amount of currency in existence. Not only do they have a “printing press” (the overwhelming majority of “money” is digital) with which they can print limitless amounts of fiat currency, which in America is backed by absolutely nothing, they create this Monopoly currency out of thin air and then loan it to us at interest. The implications of this are staggering: every dollar created is actually a loan and has interest attached to it; every dollar in your pocket or your bank account represents debt. You may think it’s yours, you may think you earned it, but it doesn’t belong to you. And, because the money was created out of nothing and loaned at interest, there will always be more debt than there is money in existence. To make sure you understand this, I will put it to you again: if every dollar ever created were to be paid back to the Federal Reserve, to which its owed, the debt would still not be paid. There is a simpler, solitary word for all of this: slavery.
- There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt - John Adams
Was this scam some sort of honest mistake by our forefathers that we are now unfortunately left to rectify? No. In 1907, JP Morgan spread a rumor that the Knickerbocker Bank was insolvent, which created a banking panic that spread throughout the entire industry. This engineered crisis was used as justification for the need of a central bank, which would, it was claimed, eliminate the bank panic and the business cycle forever, and bestow upon the American people perpetual economic growth and prosperity. No more banking panics, no more booms and busts; just steady, continuous growth. In the real world what we got was the biggest scam in the history of Western civilization: perpetual debt, perpetual boom-bust cycles, massive depressions, obscene theft and destruction of wealth.
In the wake of this banking panic, in 1910 the banking interests of the day, which include luminaries of the power elite still in control today, got together in secret on JP Morgan's private estate in Jekyll Island, Georgia. The conspirators gathered in total secrecy, under assumed names. No one could know the plot they were hatching. Here they conceived the Federal Reserve Act. Understand that this act was not written by the elected representatives of the day; it was written by banking elites, for
From that point forward, booms and busts, prosperity and depression, inflation and deflation, have been, as Charles Lindbergh put it, "worked out as we figure a mathematical equation." They create the boom, invest in it, then pull their money out, and create the bust. Then they buy up the spoils at pennies on the dollar, and inflate the bubble again, continuing the cycle. The business cycle is not naturally occurring events, they are contrived occurrences that make those on the inside monstrously rich, and allow them to continually consolidate their power and make heavier the yoke upon us all.
It is not a coincidence that the United States has been in a near non-stop state of war since the Fed's inception in 1913. Of all the crooked endeavors a nation can undertake, nothing enriches banking elites more than war; they being the financiers of this grotesquely expensive endeavor, loaning one or both sides of the conflict the funds needed, at interest. It is indeed a racket, and America has not involved itself in a single just war since that time.
Imagine that somewhere in your house is a printing press enabling you, and only you, to legally counterfeit an unlimited amount of cash. No one could know how much cash you’ve printed, or what you’ve spent the money on or who you’ve given it to. What could you do with it? What would you do? Of course, you fashion yourself a moral person who has enmity for his fellow human beings, and, highly naïve as is only natural I suppose, you expect those who possess wealth and power which are unfathomable to you, who have been raised by wealth and power, surrounded by wealth and power, living, often literally, in their ivory towers disconnected for many generations from any real notion of human existence, to have enmity too. This is not so. Nor would most people be capable of holding onto enmity were they to be given this type of power, especially as generations passed and those who inherited your power became increasingly detached from the proletariat. Power, Lord Acton teaches us, corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And so, not content with the acquisition of unlimited wealth, these banksters and robber barons have set out to do what no bloody conqueror in the history of mankind has been able to do: rule the entire world.
- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. – Goethe
As mentioned, it is essential that the slave master never allow the slave to actually know he is a slave. The financial system (which, just to get this out of the way, is not capitalism) is their primary tool for this. But, transparent as this system is, it is impossible to keep free-thinking individuals from discovering the fraud behind it, and so other mechanisms had to be put into place. Having control of the money, this is easy. You could buy up every essential social institution, so that you have the capability to literally dictate reality to people.
The government's incestuous relationship with the media is well documented and far more pervasive than most Americans realize. General Electric owns NBC, CNBC, and, along with Microsoft, MSNBC. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp owns Fox News and nearly every Fox affiliate in the entire country, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, and dozens upon dozens of television stations, newspapers, magazines, and book publishers (he even owns the copyright to the New International Version of the Holy Bible), here in the United States and all over the world. Prominent members of the media are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, including Katie Couric (CBS), Tom Brokaw and Brian Williams (NBC), and Diane Sawyer (ABC); Anderson Cooper is a former CIA intern. Reuters news service has long been owned by the house of Rothschild, and Reuters owns the Associated Press. Take a few minutes to digest the following:
- We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.- William Casey, former CIA Director, 1981
We own everyone of significance in the major media. – William Colby, Director of CIA (1973 – 1976)
In the 1940's the CIA enacted a secret program called Operation Mockingbird, which, on a massive scale, put reporters on the CIA payroll to control the dissemination of information to the American public. There is little of value to be found in the mainstream news that the government doesn't have its thumb on.
So we see that the media is controlled. But, like the monetary system, this control of the “news” is highly transparent to anyone willing and able to examine the ties between corporate media and government. More must be done to render us incapable of seeing the truth.
According to a 1993 Wall Street Journal article on declining education standards in America, inflation-adjusted spending on education has increased by 225% since 1960. In 1994 the education budget was $366.21 Billion. Since then it has far more than doubled, to $869.70 Billion. In another 5 years the budget is projected to be nearly $1.2 Trillion. And yet what has happened to the state of education in America? A 2006 report from the National Centre for Public Policy and Higher Education in California states,
- "On several measures, the United States no longer holds the leading position. Policies adopted in a number of countries over the past 20 years have helped to foster increased rates of completion at the high school level, improved access to higher education, and stable, if not higher rates of degree completion.
"In addition, at both the high school and higher education levels, measures of learning quality show US performance below the leading countries ... In the Czech Republic, Korea, Norway and the Slovak Republic, more than 90% of young adults (aged 20 to 24) have a high school credential. In the United States, 86% of this age group has a high school credential, and this share has not changed substantially over the past 25 years."
The United States ranks 19th in student scientific literacy, 24th in mathematical ability, 12th in reading ability, and 26th in in problem-solving ability. By all accounts, our standing in all of these categories will continue to decline. What is the inevitable conclusion here? We get the education we pay for. We are spending more and more money to produce dumber and dumber people. This is no accident. In 1931, Bertrand Russell wrote in his book, The Scientific Outlook,
- In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play ... All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called `co-operative,' i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.
What Russell, a Nobel Prize laureate, is saying here is, our children do not go to school to learn, to be educated; they go there to be transformed into mindless automatons, subservient and obedient and loyal to the state.
- Take at hazard one hundred children of several educated generations and one hundred uneducated children of the people and compare them in anything you please; in strength, in agility, in mind, in the ability to acquire knowledge, even in morality — and in all respects you are startled by the vast superiority on the side of the children of the uneducated. – Leo Tolstoy, "Education and Children" (1862)
Towards the end of his life, in 1962, legendary author Aldous Huxley gave a speech at Berkeley in which he candidly averred that Brave New World was not a warning, but was a blueprint for what eugenicists viewed as the ideal society:
- "There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Eugenicists such as Huxley and Russell advocated effectively pushing drugs on the plebs sordida - the unwashed masses – to keep us dumbed down and docile, and easier to control.
It began several decades earlier when, with the aid of famed propagandist and nephew of Sigmund Freud Edward Bernays, the elite, with surprising ease, convinced the American public and dental health establishment that sodium fluoride aided in reducing tooth decay. But sodium fluoride is a toxic industrial waste from the production of aluminum, phosphate fertilizer and nuclear weapons manufacturing. First used in the Soviet gulag, and later in the Nazi death camp, it was employed by these vicious regimes because it produces placidity in the subject, as well as lower IQ and sterility. Now, despite this irrefutable and easily accessed historical fact, sodium fluoride, which is too toxic to dump in the rivers, lakes and seas, is found in about two-thirds of American municipal drinking water, and I am a crackpot conspiracy theorist for telling you this.
Meanwhile, in like manner, vaccines have become the sacred cow of the pharmaceutical medical industrial complex, with America by far the most vaccinated population in the world. We also feature among the highest rates of infant mortality, SIDS, “shaken baby syndrome” (encephalitis) and autism. This despite the fact that vaccines do not work, never have worked, and are based on 18th century quack science. Vaccine ingredients contain what can reasonably be described as a Nazi experiment, including mercury, aluminum, chemical detergents, formaldehyde, foreign RNA including aborted fetal retinal tissue, and poly-sorbate 80, or preen 80, a known sterilant – all entering your body in an unnatural fashion (injection) for which your body has little ability to defend against. Particularly in children, who have weakened blood-brain barriers, these toxic substances, including violent neurotoxins (which have recently been declared as beneficial to children with developing brains), wreak havoc on the brain, and often overheat the immune system causing violent autoimmune responses (such as vaccine induced encephalitis (“shaken baby syndrome”)) and immune disorders that make them pharma clients for life.
- Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. - Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society p50, 1953
It gets worse. Upward of two-thirds of American foster children are on multiple – on average seven – psychotropic drugs; incarcerated juveniles are given psychotropic drugs, even though most of them have not been diagnosed with a psychological disorder. The use of powerful anti-depressant drugs (beginning as early as two years old) has exploded in the United States, with more than 164 million prescriptions written in 2008 for antidepressants. A study found that between 1996 and 2005, the use of anti-depressants doubled, and that, "During this period, individuals treated with antidepressants became more likely to also receive treatment with antipsychotic medications and less likely to undergo psychotherapy." (emphasis mine)
And then, finally, our food is genetically modified, producing deadly results, and processed foods are laced with grotesque substances that dumb us down and make us fat, lazy and weak. The FDA-approval process for aspartame, a former bio-chemical warfare agent(!!), was so heinously criminal, so disgustingly fraudulent, yet no one is aware of it, because we think there are people in government who look after these things for us, and they would never maliciously allow deadly substances into our foods. What people do not realize is, the agencies tasked with protecting your health and regulating industries that affect your health are all staffed with lawyers and lobbyists for the very corporations and industries they’re supposed to be watching over. The fox is guarding the henhouse.
The mind recoils that such horrors could be possible among our own leaders, who we look to as father figures to protect us from the world, but it is difficult to ignore the facts, difficult to ignore their own words. What they are telling us is, you are cattle, and you have become too numerous to control. In 1977 Obama’s Science and Technology Czar John P. Holdren co-authored a government textbook called Ecoscience, a 1,100+ page treatise on population control and eugenics, advocating forced sterilization, without our consent or even knowledge, and forced abortions. Here are some of the more horrifying excerpts from the book:
- Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
- One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone...It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
- Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control…
- The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.
Under what authority would these grotesque abuses be carried out? A "global regime", or world government, of course:
- Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment.
The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.
You will notice that as crises accelerate – real or imagined – the proposed solution will always, always involve global governance.
You may be asking yourself, how does a man with such radical ideas on the role of government and the fate of mankind hold such a high position in our government? Could it be, perhaps, that, among the elite, this way of thinking isn’t radical at all? Indeed in the realm of academia these views are mainstream.
Ecoscience was co-authored with Holdren by Paul Ehrlich and his wife, Anne Ehrlich. The former Ehrlich (a senior advisor to the Bush 43 administration) authored a book in 1968 called The Population Bomb, making the ludicrous claim that if population wasn’t curbed, Americans would be dying in the streets of starvation by the mid-1980’s. Not discouraged by this idiotic claim and its total lack of prescience, and receiving no points for originality, he and his wife co-authored a book in 1990 called The Population Explosion. It seems eugenicists, like their brethren in the global warming pseudo-science, are not deterred by embarrassing failure to predict future events. Nor are their colleagues and the institutes who continue to honor them swayed by the lack of any real value of their work. Perhaps there’s something underneath it all; something more sinister. Perhaps these beliefs are not born out of a concern for the Earth, but a desire to socially engineer our species by wiping out the weak and undesirable under the guise of saving the planet.
Dr Eric Pianka, biologist at the University of Texas, was honored as the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist during its 109th Annual Meeting at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. Giving a lecture at this meeting, which was off the record with no cameras or recording devices allowed, Pianka said the Earth would be better off without humans, that we should all be sterilized, and that a viral outbreak such as Ebola could be used to wipe out up to 90% of the population – existing plagues like AIDS simply taking too long to do the work. At the end of this speech, Pianka was given a standing ovation and was mobbed at the podium by fellow scientists. Pianka was later visited by the FBI and DHS, and questioned about possibly advocating a bio-attack.
In March, 2008 an Associated Press study revealed that at least 41 million Americans were exposed to antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones in their drinking water. The article explained away the reasoning for this as natural, but, given the long-established beliefs of the power elite and their obsession with population control and social engineering, and of course knowing the media is utterly controlled by this elite, who’s to say this isn’t purposeful? Sperm counts are decreasing in men at an accelerated rate. This could be due to other factors, but like the pharmaceuticals in the drinking water, in context with what elites within our government believe, is this just a coincidence?
Take a minute to catch your breath…
Going back to the beginning again, we know it is not a conspiracy theory that throughout history the most powerful have desired to rule the entire world. They tried conquest, they tried physical bondage, and failed miserably every time. As the current financial system evolved over several centuries, the money powers covertly usurped the military powers, and the money powers discovered there was a way to rule the world by tricking people into not only acceding to slavery, but to demand it; and not just demand it, to love it. To defend it as if it were what’s dearest to them. We see this in the reaction anyone has when you tell them something that upsets the comfortable little womb they’ve created for themselves, the womb where they can curl up in the fetal position, watch TV, and waste “their” money on everything they can possibly amass that they have no real use for, and someone else will handle all other aspects of their lives for them. God forbid we have to take control of our own lives, to think for ourselves, to live. And so anything we say to them that, were they to believe you, would force them to get up off the couch and become animated about something other than the game-winning touchdown, is violently rejected.
- When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it, always. – Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
What is to be done? I am not certain anything has to be done. I write this knowing the overwhelming majority of people who will be moved by it will be people who are already of like mind. After all, there is nothing I’ve said here that isn’t hidden in plain view, obvious to anyone who but wishes to open their eyes and look at it. As mentioned, a false sense of patriotism (my country, right or wrong) is not just a belief, it’s part of people’s identity, so that to even believe our lords and saviors in government capable of conceiving such a conspiracy, much less carrying it out, is a horrible blasphemy and would induce a horrific identity crisis in the individual. If they are going to wake up, they are not going to wake up at the demands of other people; in fact our insistence that they wake up and look at the horrors of the world is likely to repulse them.
For me, it is time to apply what I know to my own life. Just like the government has no right to tell me how to live my life, I have no right to tell people how to live theirs. If you love your slavery, enjoy yourself. Worship celebrities and learn all about your favorite football team, remaining ignorant of anything of real importance or actual fulfillment. Fatten yourself on processed foods, drink massive amounts of beer, and buy a 52’ flat screen plasma TV with 400+ channels. Take pills to make you happy and get every vaccine they push on you.
- The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. – Audre Lorde
And some may say, but ignorant people vote and consent to policies that affect my life. This is true only if you operate within the paradigm your masters built for you. If you don’t want to pay higher taxes, don’t pay taxes at all. Your income is compensation for your labor; taxing it is slavery. If you’re concerned about price inflation caused by the Fed’s monetary policy, get off the grid. The necessities of life have always been free; they have fooled you into thinking you must pay for them. The trade-off is, you will have to put in the time. You will have to build, and grow, and cultivate. But at least you will be in control. You will know that what you’re eating isn’t laced with toxins that make you fat, stupid and weak. You’ll know your water isn’t poisoned with chemicals to make you docile and complacent. You will sleep normal, and have energy. You will be alive.
This is my future. Not stupidity. Not slavery. Not disease, or unnatural death. I can’t make you want the same. The only way to change the world is to change yourself.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
This is just an example, and there may be other variables to consider, but it seems to me that no matter what our environment, there will always be those who are immune to it, either positively or negatively.
As I remember the experiences and the different stages I've gone through in my journey to higher consciousness, I recall the changes I've gone through, from completely ignorant "liberal", to completely ignorant, frothing-at-the-mouth neocon, to somewhat less ignorant whatever. And, like most people I suppose, though I was asleep and not aware of them at the time, seeds were planted, drops of knowledge accumulated in the back of my brain that eventually reached critical mass, and I could no longer revel in the lie that 2+2=5.
Like all of the wise philosophers of the past, I have come to the conclusion that the more I know, the more I realize I know nothing, except that truth is a journey, not a destination, and is always, always beyond your feeble five senses' capability to fully comprehend. Through this journey I've come to realize that politics is useless, especially now at this stage of the great cycle of ages, when ignorance and materialism are so imbued in our culture that we have been enslaved even though we proclaim our glorious and eternal freedom. It's "the end of history".
For me, my journey has taken me beyond the political, beyond the materialism and the ignorance, and into the spiritual. It no longer matters to me who my so-called "rulers" are, for only I rule myself. I realize that for the truth aware we usually feel we have an obligation to tell the truth to the mob, even though they hate us for it, but with all that's happened, and as close as we are to the abyss, the way I see it, if you're not aware yet, no amount of ranting from me or anyone else is going to make any sense to you at this point.
Is this pessimism, cynicism, or is it just realistic? I don't know for sure. Who can say? There's so much information and propaganda out there to know anything for certain as far as anyone but yourself and your own gut instincts are concerned, and unfortunately for all I've learned I'm still, like Newton, a boy playing on the sea-shore, diverting myself now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.
It is my personal gut feeling that in the coming year or two great and profound changes are going to occur. They could be positive, negative, or both. As individuals we must look at the information available and interpret it in a way we feel is best for us. Will the government collapse the economy as a segue to world government and a cashless control grid? Highly likely. Will they use this global governance to enact a eugenics population reduction pogrom, wiping away upwards of 6 billion people from the planet? Almost certainly, although the extent to which they will be successful can't be known at this time; the program is certainly in motion. Will their agenda be thwarted by shifts in consciousness beyond their ability to control? I think so, but not before great suffering and death. Is there a looming cataclysm that will reset civilization, as has likely happened at least once in the past? It's possible.
My path, at this point, takes a new direction, away from what I believe to be the trivial and the mundane, which we are conditioned to believe has the utmost importance. And I'm not even talking about celebrity worship, pop culture, and obsession with mega-hyped corporate sporting events, et al, as retardedly trivial as these in fact are. Some would say, turn off your TV and get involved, do something, vote!
But even this, in the grand scheme of things, is worthless, for it propagates the lie that you need to be a part of something external for your life to have meaning. In your search for a leader, you will, as we have, eventually come upon leaders who will lead us, meek and obedient, through well-trodden corridors into the slaughterhouse. This has been and always will be the inevitable outcome of people begging to be ruled, for we know that power feeds upon power, power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The point of all this is that I am detaching myself from the political, and doing what I feel is best for the world, by saving myself. Isn't one of, if not the, main causes of the filth and degradation we see today not only our obsession with how the lives of other people are lived, but also the fact that we have absolutely no control of our own lives? While we obsess over celebrities, athletes; while we waste time fighting to make sure homosexuals can’t get married, while we wax hysterical about mosques being built on so-called holy ground, while we desperately search for the historically-elusive benevolent ruler(s), how many aspects of our lives are actually completely and totally within our own control? If you think about it, very little. Someone else grows and raises our food for us. Someone else provides our water. Someone else makes our clothes. Someone else produces our power. Someone else protects us from our supposed enemies. What would we do if something happened that caused one or all of these essential services to collapse? Don’t think it can happen? Ask the people who lived through Hurricane Katrina.
So in parting, I am done trying to tell you how to live your life. If, after everything that’s happened, you continue to wish to immerse yourself in distraction and triviality, that is your choice. It is my personal feeling that events are about to take place that will cause people like you to suffer, and I intend to be one of the people who survive, and hopefully thrive. By thrive I do not mean sitting in my living room watching my 52’ flat screen plasma while the rest of the world burns; I mean I will be fed, have water to drink, and on a path to inner peace and elevated consciousness. To me, this is what living is.
The hallmark of so-called civilization is not so-called advanced technology; it is knowledge in pursuit of higher purpose. This is why civilizations many thousands of years older than our supposed enlightened selves were far more advanced than we are. When so much of our wealth and energy are spent on "innovating" distraction and weapons of war, and so little is spent on discovering higher truth (in fact, great wealth and energy is spent concealing higher truth), how do we call ourselves civilized? And some would say, but we need these weapons of war because there are people out there who want to destroy us. To which I answer, what are you doing watching TV, or social networking on your iPad, if people are trying to destroy you? Maybe your son will grow up and kill your enemy for you. Someone else...some other time; Idol is on tonight.
- Reality is an illusion, albeit a persistent one. – Albert Einstein
So that is my path: knowledge. Higher truth. Elevation of consciousness. And self-sufficiency. There is no manipulation of nature to form technology that can surpass the “technology” of the spirit, of your own consciousness. Quantum mechanics teaches us that the universe as we know it would not exist if we were not here to observe it. That's the power of our consciousness; that's the god in you. All great minds and philosophers knew this, long before Heisenberg.
When Jesus said if you had the faith of a mustard seed you could tell a mountain to more from here to there and it would obey you, he was on to something. Egyptian texts tell of the “goddess” Isis moving massive 100-ton blocks of stone by the power of her voice alone. And still we wonder, how did they build the pyramids? We ask this knowing that our most advanced technology and knowledge in engineering would still have great difficulty achieving such a feat. And yet we never consider that maybe their technology was elevated consciousness; enlightenment; awareness. Maybe they were built in a more enlightened age, when materialism and ignorance and ego didn't cement our third eye shut. We only use 10% of our brain's capabilities; what could we do if we could harness all of its power?
I do not expect to teach myself how to move megalithic objects with my mind. I simply want a deeper understanding of myself, of the nature of things, of my place and purpose in this so-called reality. I want to live in peace, and enjoy these things with my Twin Flame, and if we are lucky, a handful of like-minded individuals. For me, a single moment of true awareness is worth more than a lifetime of trivial pursuits and collection of possessions that you cannot take with you when you pass from this world. All of you have my love and best wishes, and your safety and health will never be out of my thoughts. Good luck.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
The German writer Johan Wolfgang von Goethe once famously said, “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Most of us who would consider ourselves awakened, enlightened or unplugged recognize this truth in the pathology of the mob, who unwittingly worship authority and adore their slave masters while proclaiming themselves “free”. And yet there are some among us, who are otherwise enlightened, who believe there is a tradition, a heritage, a history, and/or a culture in this country that they feel it is their duty to restore; that they, the People, are capable of restoring it. They cling to this memory as if they have ever actually experienced it.
And so, even as the last vestiges of the old republic are being swept away, many people feel as though, this time, they, the defenders of the republic, will do what so many generations through so many elections have failed to do: vote in people who will follow the Constitution, abolish the Federal Reserve, end the illegal wars, and establish free trade and a free market, ushering in a new Golden Age of freedom in America that will last for all time. Or something like that.
If I had any hope of the same, and it was a fleeting hope at best, it was obliterated permanently by the traitorous defeat of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill this summer. It’s not that it was defeated; no one in their right mind could think they would actually allow an audit of the private Federal Reserve, which had existed for upwards of an entire century without any government oversight whatsoever, opening the hyper-secret books to the most arch criminal entity probably in the history of human kind and thus spelling its destruction. No, what cemented this resolve in me was the manner in which it was defeated. More co-sponsors originally attached their name to this bill than the number of votes needed to actually pass it. Well, duh, you’d think all they'd have to do is hold a vote and it goes to the Senate! Victory! But no. When it finally came to a vote, 122 of its original co-sponsors voted against their own bill.
- Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws. – Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Anyone with an understanding of the Federal Reserve system and its implications for our society should have no confusion over what caused these scoundrels to switch their votes. But sometimes, as Orwell once put it, restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.
The Federal Reserve is a private institution. It is not part of the government (no more “federal” than Federal Express). It has no government oversight, and all who are involved in its machinations are unelected and have no accountability to the government or the People. And yet they are bestowed the almost god-like power of having free license to counterfeit as much money as they want, with a complete monopoly on the currency used. Worse, every dollar they create - our money – is loaned back to us at interest. The implications of this are startling and obvious, though most never give it a second thought: there will always be more debt owed than there is money in existence.
Worse, with this infinite bank account of our money with which they can spend with impunity, they have bought up every essential institution in this country: our education, our military, our media, and, particularly important regarding the current subject, and as demonstrated by the manner in which the Audit the Fed bill was defeated, our entire political system. These banksters, these robber barons, have scientifically devised a system, a matrix, for which all the power will always rest with them, while bestowing upon the plebs the illusion of power and choice. The Republic, as we know it, died when this criminal enterprise was spawned, in 1913.
Most people can see the illusion in American politics known as the false left-right paradigm, but they don’t recognize the implications for where this paradigm originates, and what it will mean to every election, no matter who you vote for, no matter what their campaign rhetoric. For the fact of the matter is, no matter how outside the system a candidate might be, or thinks he or she is, once inside that system he or she becomes the system. If they resist, if they don’t follow the agenda, some ghost from their past magically appears and attempts to destroy them. Or they mysteriously die in a plane crash, or a kayaking accident, or shoot themselves in the back of the head. The paradigm cannot be overcome so long as the Federal Reserve exists, and the Federal Reserve cannot be destroyed so long as the paradigm exists, because the banksters created the paradigm through the Federal Reserve’s infinite money creation machine to facilitate their own perpetuity and invincibility. The more you operate inside the system, inside this paradigm, the more you fight and struggle within it to change it, the more deeply you become enslaved by it. Like a Chinese finger puzzle, you pull and pull and the harder you pull the tighter its grip becomes, when all along all you had to do was relax and stop fighting it, so that it slips right off.
Thus, the only power they have is our cooperation, and, conversely, the only real freedom we have is our non-cooperation. This goes against every fiber of our being, because we are taught to believe in the power of our vote, that so many before us have fought and died (in wars started over lies that had nothing to do with your own personal freedoms) to give you this right, a right so many people in other parts of the world would give their own lives to have. Gosh, you know, you just have to vote, don’t you? Understand that the ability to vote only serves to put people into power over you that you falsely call your servants. These “servants”, while presenting the illusion of bowing before your will, do not serve you at all. They serve people above them, people you cannot vote out of office, and are thus never threatened by the consequences of their own malfeasance, for which their puppets gladly fall upon their own swords. You keep voting the bums out of office, and yet the same agenda is served, while the ousted politicians go on to make millions working for the same corporations they whored themselves to while in office. What is accomplished, therefore? You have only inured yourself further in the mire of their own system.
Your first and greatest loyalty is to freedom. The Republic we’re fighting to save is a rotting corpse, dead since 1913. Accept it and move on. Like the Chinese finger puzzle, let us relax, and breathe, and stop fighting a leviathan that is fed by our own fruitless and foolish struggle to exert control over it. Let us turn our back on our masters, and walk away from them clutching at our feet. For to see the farm is to leave it, and without the power that we, ourselves, bestow upon them, by our enthusiastic cooperation and conformity, they are nothing. They are fat, bloated bags of gas, full of sound and fury yet signifying nothing.
Stop voting for their puppets; stop pretending that you’re capable of choosing candidates that will miraculously serve you and not them, as if you somehow possess powers beyond that of previous generations who sought to do the same. Do you think that politicians got elected by telling the People they planned on serving the money powers? There are 535 members of Congress and only one of them can be said to have a consistent record grounded in the Constitution. That’s not because people have been stupid and have consciously voted almost exclusively for establishment puppets generation after generation. The establishment isn’t called the establishment for nothing. Stop indulging in groupthink. Don’t look for a movement to be a part of, a movement that will only be co-opted by the establishment. Stop looking for saviors. Stop looking for something external to be a part of and start being part of your own life. Nothing else matters.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
I say it was a waste of time because, as time went by, I eventually discovered that, despite my own verdict on Islam as a religion, it had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks. Not because its scriptures taught peaceful co-existence – quite the contrary. But because it wasn’t 19 Muslims with boxcutters who were responsible for it all; it was criminal elements within the US and Israeli governments.
Obviously anyone in the truth movement will have no qualms about a mosque near “Ground Zero”, or at least no more qualms than they would have about a mosque anywhere else. It’s completely irrelevant. But there is something deeper and darker about the whole issue that is driving people into a frenzy, and creating a furor of anti-Muslim violence and hate that distracts from real issues that truly affect Americans.
It all begins with the location and substance of the actual institution. Rational people can obviously see it is not built on the ashes of ground zero. In fact it is being built in an abandoned Burlington Coat Factory warehouse, which was built before the 9-11 attacks and obviously was not destroyed by them. It is at least a full two New York blocks away from the “pit”, and if you’ve ever been to New York City you know how massive a block is.
The hypocrisy involved here is staggering, as “conservatives” who proclaim themselves as champions of both religious freedom and private property rights claim that, while still ardently supportive of both, they oppose the mosque because what you have a right to do and what you should do are somehow at odds in a free society. It should be apparent to anyone, and normally is, if conservatives are referring to Christian religious freedom at least, that you do not have a right not to be offended in this country, so there should obviously be no discrepancy between what one has a right to do and what one should do.
But there’s a special exception to this rule, and an exception in the rights of private property, where Muslims are concerned. Not because Islam had anything to do with 9-11, mind you; Newt Ginrich and the rest of the neocon cabal will be the first to point that out. They're not saying it's because Islam is to blame for 9-11, except that they are. They just don't have the moral courage to say so openly. Incidentally, there’s a strip club, a sex shop and a gambling hall within the same radius as the “mosque” (it’s not a mosque, either), and there’s a mosque inside the Pentagon, but nobody has a problem with these "abominations" on these “hallowed” grounds.
Of course, none of this information is privileged, and anyone who bothers to apply critical thinking to the issue would’ve discovered this easily. But in our stupefied, dumbed down and distracted society, people revel in ignorance and stupidity like its a badge of honor, and we cede common sense and intelligence to talking heads and politicians who tells us what to think.
This became obvious when it was revealed the imam that will head the Islamic center (not a mosque) is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The role the CFR plays in American media and geo-politics is too involved to go into detail here, but anyone familiar with this shadow government can put two and two together when a key player in this issue is from among its ranks.
To further illustrate the circus sideshow aspect of this fake controversy, the number two shareholder in News Corps is a partial funder of the “mosque”; News Corp is of course the owner of the cable news network most responsible for hyping this fake controversy: Fox News. Somehow I doubt Boobus will boycott Fox News until they stop funding the “ground zero mosque”. In fact, there is no doubt. They’re too interested in trivialities to figure this all out for themselves, which would take a whopping half hour away from their time spent obsessing over football or the new Hurt Locker reality TV show. Bill O’Reilly and Hannity and Sarah Palin tell them they have to be outraged and oppose the "mosque", and that is the extent of their critical thinking capabilities.
This is a sad example of the mental state of the average American. Nearly two-thirds of Americans oppose the "ground zero mosque", a massive number of people who are just complete imbeciles. Just when you think, with all the real life events that truly effect all of us; events that show the US government and its puppet masters are far more a threat to the American way of life than some decadent, self-destructive 7th Century warrior’s ideology with no navy or air force (except what the United States sells to them) and no revenue they can spend to threaten us (except for our own petrodollars and the drug money we help them cultivate) that people are finally snapping out of their chemical and indoctrination induced comas, the globalists show us just how hopelessly enslaved we really are.