Monday, June 29, 2009

Vaccines: The Real Weapons of Mass Destruction

Once you understand the global power elite's religion, which is eugenics, it becomes clear why they put known poisons, neurotoxins, and carcinogens in our food, water, and vaccines. When a vaccination program becomes mandatory in the fall, be assured you are being attacked by a genocidal eugenics cabal hell bent on wiping out 80-90% of the world's population. And be assured Bill Gates and David Rockefeller don't drink fluoridated water or vaccinate themselves.


    The basic truth that served as the foundation for the mountain of lies known as vaccinations was the observation that mammals who recover from infection with microorganisms acquire natural immunity from further infections. Whenever T cells (the little packman cells which kill viruses, bacteria, and cancer cells, thus conferring cellular immunity) and B cells (antibody producing cells which confer humoral immunity) are activated by various substances foreign to the body called antigens, some of the T and B cells become memory cells. Thus, the next time the individual meets up with that same antigen, the immune system can be quickly triggered to demolish it. This is the process known as immunity.

    This truth gave birth to a beLIEf that if a foreign antigen was injected into an individual, that individual would then become immune to a future infection. This beLIEf, (you see the lie in the middle), was given the name, “vaccinations”. What the promoters of vaccination failed to realize is that the respiratory tract of ALL mammals (since animals are just as devastated by these inoculations with disease as are humans) contain secretory IgA (an antibody which initiates the natural God given immune response) within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting organisms into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.

    The mechanism by which the immune system is corrupted can best be realized when you understand that the two poles of the immune system (the cellular and humoral mechanisms) have a reciprocal relationship. Thus, when one is stimulated, the other is inhibited. Since vaccines activate the B cells to secrete antibody, the T cells are subsequently suppressed. This suppression of the cell mediated response is a key factor in the development of cancer and life threatening infections. In fact, the “prevention” of a disease via vaccination is, in reality, an inability to expel organisms due to the suppression of the cell-mediated response. Thus, rather than preventing disease; they actually prevent the disease from ever being resolved. The organisms continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other organisms (as demonstrated by the work of Professor Antoine Bechamp), depending on the acidity and toxicity of the internal terrain of the body. Note that Bechamp proved that Louis Pasteur’s “germ theory” of disease was incorrect due to this ability of organisms to transform and mutate based on the body’s internal terrain (as Pasteur admitted on his deathbed). Thus, treatment of infection with antibiotics as well as “prevention” of disease with vaccines are both just examples of cutting off the branches of dis-ease, when the root of the cause is a toxic internal environment. However, since Pasteur’s germ theory was conducive to the profits of the burgeoning pharmaceutical companies who only manage dis-ease, no mention of the work of Professor Bechamp has been made in medical school curricula.

    To make matters worse than the suppression of cellular immunity which occurs when vaccines are injected, adjuvants (which are substances added to vaccines to enhance the antibody response) can actually lead to serious side effects themselves. Adjuvants include oil emulsions, mineral compounds (which may contain the heavy metal aluminum), bacterial products, liposomes (which allow delayed release of substances), and squalene. The side effects of adjuvants themselves include hyperactivity of B cells leading to pathologic levels of antibody production, as well as allergic reaction to the adjuvants themselves (as demonstrated in Gulf War I soldiers injected with vaccines containing the adjuvant squalene, to which antibodies were found in many soldiers). Note that the pathologically elevated hyperactivity of antibody production caused by adjuvants also results in a distraction from the other antigens that the immune system encounters “naturally”, which must be addressed to maintain health.

    This hyperactivity of the humoral (antibody producing) pole of the immune system is, in this author’s opinion, the sole cause of all autoimmune diseases. The only thing which determines which autoimmune disease you develop is which tissues in your body are attacked by auto-antibodies. If the inside lining of the gastrointestinal tract (the mucosa) is attacked by auto-antibodies you develop leaky gut syndrome (which leads to food allergies when partially digested food particles are released into the bloodstream, are recognized as antigens foreign to the body, and elicit an antibody response against those food particles that becomes heightened every time that same food is eaten and released into the bloodstream partially digested again). Crohn’s disease and colitis are also caused by auto-antibody attack on the mucosa of the GI tract itself. If the islet (insulin producing) cells of the pancreas are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop insulin dependent (juvenile) diabetes. If the respiratory mucosa is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop “leaky lung” syndrome where, just as with leaky gut, antigens recognized as foreign to the body which are inhaled are able to traverse the lining of the respiratory tract, causing the creation of antibodies against those antigens (usually dust, mold, pet or pollen antigens). When these substances are inhaled again, the allergic response producing constriction of the bronchioles is called asthma. If the components of the articular surface of the joints are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop rheumatoid (or juvenile) arthritis. If the skin is attacked, you develop “leaky skin” syndrome, where contact antigens which could not otherwise traverse the skin are allowed in, leading to skin allergies to contact antigens. Additionally, depending on which level of the skin is attacked by auto-antibodies, (i.e., the epidermis or dermis), you develop eczema, psoriasis or scleroderma. If the kidney tissue is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop one of the many types of nephritis, depending on which component of renal tissue is attacked (for example, with glomerulonephritis, the basement membrane of the glomerular apparatus within the kidney (which filters blood to form urine) is attacked by auto-antibodies, thus allowing protein to escape from the serum into the urine). If you develop auto-antibodies against thyroid gland tissue, you develop Grave’s disease. If you develop auto-antibodies against the tissue of the thymus gland (which is crucial in T cell production and function), you develop myasthenia gravis. If you develop auto-antibodies against the very DNA in the nucleus of all cells, you develop systemic Lupus (thus, the potential autoimmune potential of DNA vaccines being developed now is self evident; worse yet, DNA components from these vaccines can be incorporated into your DNA, leading to actual genetic changes which could cause extinction of all (vaccinated) life on the Earth). And on, and on, and on.

Please read all of it...

Monday, June 22, 2009

How conveeeeeeeenient

Just when the US government is clamoring for war against Pakistan, out comes al-CIA to tell us, yeah, you might wanna invade Pakistan, because we're planning on stealing their nukes and using them against you. It's as if al Qaeda can't help themselves; they just HAVE TO go on camera and tell the whole world EXACTLY what they're planning to do it. Apparently, element of surprise just doesn't translate into Arabic. Of course, al Qaeda has become synonymous with the Taliban, so, even though the Taliban are a bunch of bedouins who just want us out of their country so they can get back to banning the heroin trade and flogging women who let their burkas slip, the controlled media would have you believe they're just as dangerous as bin Laden, who was (I say "was" because he is very likely dead) a CIA asset.

    By Inal Ersan

    DUBAI (Reuters) - If it were in a position to do so, Al Qaeda would use Pakistan's nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States, a top leader of the group said in remarks aired on Sunday.

    Pakistan has been battling al Qaeda's Taliban allies in the Swat Valley since April after their thrust into a district 100 km (60 miles) northwest of the capital raised fears the nuclear-armed country could slowly slip into militant hands.

    "God willing, the nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of the Americans and the mujahideen would take them and use them against the Americans," Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al Qaeda's in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television.

    Abu al-Yazid was responding to a question about U.S. safeguards to seize control over Pakistan's nuclear weapons in case Islamist fighters came close to doing so.

    "We expect that the Pakistani army would be defeated (in Swat) ... and that would be its end everywhere, God willing."

    Asked about the group's plans, the Egyptian militant leader said: "The strategy of the (al Qaeda) organisation in the coming period is the same as in the previous period: to hit the head of the snake, the head of tyranny -- the United States.

    "That can be achieved through continued work on the open fronts and also by opening new fronts in a manner that achieves the interests of Islam and Muslims and by increasing military operations that drain the enemy financially."

    The militant leader suggested that naming a new leader for the group's unit in the Arabian Peninsula, Abu Basir al-Wahayshi, could revive its campaign in Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter.

    "Our goals have been the Americans ... and the oil targets which they are stealing to gain power to strike the mujahideen and Muslims."

    "There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader."

    Abu al-Yazid, also known as Abu Saeed al-Masri, said al Qaeda will continue "with large scale operations against the enemy" -- by which he meant the United States.

    "We have demanded and we demand that all branches of al Qaeda carry out such operations," he said, referring to attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The militant leader said al Qaeda would be willing to accept a truce of about 10 years' duration with the United States if Washington agreed to withdraw its troops from Muslim countries and stopped backing Israel and the pro-Western governments of Muslim nations.

    Asked about the whereabouts of al Qaeda's top leaders, he said: "Praise God, sheikh Osama (bin Laden) and sheikh Ayman al-Zawahri are safe from the reach of the enemies, but we would not say where they are; moreover, we do not know where they are, but we're in continuous contact with them."

British Woman Arrested, Imprisoned for Asking Cop for Badge Number

Britain is now a grotesque police state, and we're not far behind. This is sickening.

Confidential memo reveals US plan to provoke an invasion of Iraq

Just like all our wars. When the media is completely under your control, and the public is thirsty for blood because of an attack the government carried out, they'll get their war, one way or the other. And they got it.

    Guardian UK -

    A confidential record of a meeting between President Bush and Tony Blair before the invasion of Iraq, outlining their intention to go to war without a second United Nations resolution, will be an explosive issue for the official inquiry into the UK's role in toppling Saddam Hussein.

    The memo, written on 31 January 2003, almost two months before the invasion and seen by the Observer, confirms that as the two men became increasingly aware UN inspectors would fail to find weapons of mass destruction (WMD) they had to contemplate alternative scenarios that might trigger a second resolution legitimising military action.

    Bush told Blair the US had drawn up a provocative plan "to fly U2 reconnaissance aircraft painted in UN colours over Iraq with fighter cover". Bush said that if Saddam fired at the planes this would put the Iraqi leader in breach of UN resolutions.

    The president expressed hopes that an Iraqi defector would be "brought out" to give a public presentation on Saddam's WMD or that someone might assassinate the Iraqi leader. However, Bush confirmed even without a second resolution, the US was prepared for military action. The memo said Blair told Bush he was "solidly with the president".

    The five-page document, written by Blair's foreign policy adviser, Sir David Manning, and copied to Sir Jeremy Greenstock, the UK ambassador to the UN, Jonathan Powell, Blair's chief of staff, the chief of the defence staff, Admiral Lord Boyce, and the UK's ambassador to Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer, outlines how Bush told Blair he had decided on a start date for the war.

    Paraphrasing Bush's comments at the meeting, Manning, noted: "The start date for the military campaign was now pencilled in for 10 March. This was when the bombing would begin."

    Last night an expert on international law who is familar with the memo's contents said it provided vital evidence into the two men's frames of mind as they considered the invasion and its aftermath and must be presented to the Chilcott inquiry established by Gordon Brown to examine the causes, conduct and consequences of the Iraq war.

Saturday, June 20, 2009


We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people.


Friday, June 19, 2009

Accused 9/11 mastermind: ‘I make up stories’ to stop torture

This is why torture was never acceptable prior to 9-11. IT DOESN'T WORK. It's also why they can't charge or try any of these "terrorists". All of the confessions and "evidence" were obtained under torture.

    In potentially another blow to advocates of torture and harsh interrogation, transcripts released yesterday show that alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed says he made up stories to appease his interrogators.

    ”I make up stories,” Mohammed is quoted as saying in his 2007 Gitmo hearing. The alleged 9/11 plotter claimed to have taken part in at least 29 terrorist plots.

    Mohammed says he told his questioners he didn’t know the location of Osama Bin Laden, and was tortured as a result.

    “”Where is he? I don’t know,” Mohammed said. ‘Then he torture me. Then I said, ‘Yes, he is in this area or this is al Qaeda which I don’t know him.’ I said no, they torture me.’”

    “Yet at the same military tribunal hearing, Mohammed ticked off a list of 29 terror plots in which he took part,” AP reported. “The transcripts were released as part of a lawsuit in which the American Civil Liberties Union is seeking documents and details of the government’s terror detainee programs.”

    Taken from page 15 of the PDF:

    ….be under questioning so many statement which been some of them I make up stories just location UBL. Where is he? I don’t know. Then he torture me. Then I said yes, he is in this area or this is al Qaida which I don’t him. I said no, they torture me. Does he know you? I say don’t him but how come he know you. I told him I’m senior man. Many people know me which I don’t them. I ask him even if he knew George Bush. He said, yes I do. He don’t know you that not means its false.

29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction

Don't be afraid to see what you see.

    29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11

    More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation.

    For Some, the Doubts Began Early

    “Something is wrong with this picture,” thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings’ responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, “How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?”

    Lomba was hardly alone in his discomfort. Most structural engineers were surprised when the towers fell. They mainly kept their misgivings to themselves, though, as Scientific American and the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, BBC, the History Channel and government agencies such as FEMA and NIST offered varying and often imaginative theories to explain how fires brought the towers down.

Full article here (pdf).

Alcohol abuse by GIs soars since '03

Not to accentuate the obvious, but war really is hell. A great deal of our best and brightest are being shipped off to fight wars that do nothing to further America's interests, and they are changed forever. But don't worry, they're 'keeping a close eye on it'.

    USA Today -

    The rate of Army soldiers enrolled in treatment programs for alcohol dependency or abuse has nearly doubled since 2003 — a sign of the growing stress of repeated deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Army statistics and interviews.

    Soldiers diagnosed by Army substance abuse counselors with alcoholism or alcohol abuse, such as binge drinking, increased from 6.1 per 1,000 soldiers in 2003 to an estimated 11.4 as of March 31, according to the data. The latest data cover the first six months of the fiscal year that began in October.

    "We're seeing a lot of alcohol consumption," Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the Army's vice chief of staff, told top officers during a briefing on the Army's growing number of suicides.

    In a statement to USA TODAY, Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expressed concern. "I'm sure there are many factors for the rising numbers (of enrollments) ... but I can't believe the stress our people are under after eight years of combat isn't taking a toll," he said.

    Likewise, Marines who screen positive for drug or alcohol problems increased 12% from 2005 to 2008, according to Marine Corps statistics. In addition, there were 1,060 drunken-driving cases involving Marines during the first seven months of fiscal 2009, which began in October, compared with 1,430 cases in all of fiscal 2008.

    In an interview last week, Marine Corps Sgt. Maj. Carlton Kent said alcohol abuse is an indication of the stress, particularly with the ongoing cycle of combat deployments. "Alcohol can tie into a lot of things, and we're just keeping a close eye on it," Kent said.
    Concerns about alcohol abuse led Chiarelli to issue a memo in May urging commanders to treat and, where necessary under Army rules, punish soldiers who test positive for substance abuse or fail blood-alcohol tests. During a visit to six Army installations this year, Chiarelli said, he found hundreds of cases where soldiers who failed those tests, in some cases more than once, were not treated for the problem or processed for possible discharge, as required by Army regulation.

McMenacing? Cop Accused Of Pulling Gun At McD's

I'm waiting for a study to be released that documents a dramatic increase in these kinds of incidents. It seems to me that there is, but I have to admit I haven't been paying attention long enough to say for sure. At the same time, I'd like to hope this isn't how it's always been. But then again, when your policy is to emphasize hiring veterans and applicants of lower IQ, (seriously, why would they reject applicants because their IQs were too high? Think about that for a moment...) we should expect these kinds of incidents. And I don't have a problem with veterans, but veterans are trained with an entirely different mentality than domestic law enforcement (or at least, they used to be), and should not be allowed to police American civilians.

    A Denver police officer has been suspended after allegedly brandishing his gun at a McDonald's restaurant in Aurora after his order took too long to fill.

    Aurora police confirmed the CBS4 investigation saying the incident occurred May 21 at the McDonald's at 18181 East Hampden Avenue.

    A spokesperson for the Aurora Police Department said they plan to present the case -- now classified as a felony menacing incident -- to the Arapahoe County District Attorney's Office Thursday for possible filing of criminal charges.

    Sources familiar with the case, and the fast food worker's account of what happened, say two off-duty Denver police officers placed an order from their car in the early morning hours of May 21. But once at the drive through window, the employee said the men became agitated and angry at how long their food was taking. The men thought they were being ignored, according to contacts familiar with the worker's account. The male clerk then said one of the officer's flashed his police badge and pointed a pistol through the drive through window in a threatening manner, before driving off without paying.

    Both officers are assigned to Denver International Airport although only one has been placed on administrative leave with pay, pending the outcome of the case.

Protesting, according To Pentagon, is terrorism

I told them. I told the neo-cons and the Statists that they were the real targets of all the domestic wiretapping, all the surveillance, all the civil rights violations. And they said, No! Only terrorists have their rights violated because they didn't have any in the first place! And never mind that these people, who haven't been charged with anything, are considered to be lower than dogs by these ravenous fascists, these useful idiots. But they just weren't capable of putting two and two together. Not even when the MIAC and the DHS memos leaked, which basically painted every American with the same broad brush. I mean, you did read them, didn't you? They didn't leave anyone out. We're all terrorists now. Terrorists with no rights under the Constitution. Oh yes. They're going to be in for a rude awakening and find out the hard way that their fluoride and their vaccines and their prescription drugs haven't completely drained us of our free will and our spirit of resistance. The last thing I want is a revolt that will tear this nation to pieces, but who can deny our options become fewer by the day?

    Fox News

    A written exam administered by the Pentagon labels "protests" as a form of “low-level terrorism” — enraging civil liberties advocates and activist groups who say it shows blatant disregard of the First Amendment.

    The written exam, given as part of Department of Defense employees’ routine training, includes a multiple-choice question that asks:

    “Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism?”

    — Attacking the Pentagon

    — IEDs

    — Hate crimes against racial groups

    — Protests

    The correct answer, according to the exam, is "Protests."

    “Its part of a pattern of equating dissent and protest with terrorism," said Ann Brick, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained a copy of the question after a Defense Department employee who was taking the test printed the screen on his or her computer terminal.

    "It undermines the core constitutional values the Department of Defense is supposed to be defending,” Brick said, referring to the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble.

    She said the ACLU has asked the Defense Department to remove the question and send out a correction to all employees who took the exam.

    “There were other employees who were unhappy with it and disturbed by it,” Brick said.

    Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Les Melnyk said the Defense Department is looking into the matter and expects to provide more information later Wednesday.

Here's the best part. I mean, it's like they gave out copies of 1984 to everyone in the government, military, and law enforcement and said, "Get a load of this stuff! This guy had some great ideas! We gotta try em out!"

    We need to determine if it’s something we’re currently doing,” Melnyk said. “A lot of the information in this exam is intended for people stationed abroad. We counsel those people to avoid demonstrations.”

    Anti-war protesters, who say they have been targets of federal surveillance for years, were livid when they were told about the exam question.

    “That’s illegal,” said George Martin, national co-chairman of United for Peace and Justice. “Protest in terms of legal dissent has to be recognized, especially by the authorities.

    "It’s not terrorism or a lack of patriotism. We care enough to be active in our government.”

You're all traitors. You don't grovel at the feet and lick the boots of Leviathan. You all deserve to be hung.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

HR 2749: Totalitarian Control of the Food Supply

Let this sink in: the government knows our entire economic and social fabric is about to collapse. They know Americans are learning to be more self-sufficient in anticipation of this crisis. Government has little control over a people who can sustain themselves. For one thing, they can't poison you with their genetic engineering and pesticides and fluoridation. And worst than that, they can't tax you. This is an attempt to get a foothold on private agriculture while they still can. You can be certain that they are trying to figure out a way to control wind and solar energy as well.

    Food Freedom
    June 17, 2009

    A new food safety bill is on the fast track in Congress-HR 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. The bill needs to be stopped.

    HR 2749 gives FDA tremendous power while significantly diminishing existing judicial restraints on actions taken by the agency. The bill would impose a one-size-fits-all regulatory scheme on small farms and local artisanal producers; and it would disproportionately impact their operations for the worse.

    HR 2749 does not address underlying causes of food safety problems such as industrial agriculture practices and the consolidation of our food supply. The industrial food system and food imports are badly in need of effective regulation, but the bill does not specifically direct regulation or resources to these areas.

    To read a detailed account of the bill, go to:

    (Read the section on tracing. That is NAIS, isn’t it? – highly disguised yet triggered by the word “trace.” )

    Alarming Provisions:

    Some of the more alarming provisions in the bill are:

    * HR 2749 would impose an annual registration fee of $500 on any “facility” that holds, processes, or manufactures food. [isn't this every home in the US, every garden?] Although “farms” are exempt, the agency has defined “farm” narrowly. [What is the definition?] And people making foods such as lacto-fermented vegetables, cheeses, or breads would be required to register and pay the fee, which could drive beginning and small producers out of business during difficult economic times. [Yes. There are laws against this corporate-size-destroys-the-little-guy policy, aren't there? Are home bread or cheese or lacto-fermented vegetable makers who make for their own families included in this?]

    * HR 2749 would empower FDA to regulate how crops are raised and harvested. It puts the federal government right on the farm, dictating to our farmers. [This astounding control opens the door to CODEX. WTO "good farming practices" will include the elimination of organic farming by eliminating manure, mandating GMO animal feed, imposing animal drugs, and ordering applications of petrochemical fertilizers and pesticides. Farmers, thus, will be locked not only into the industrialization of once normal and organic farms but into the forced purchase of industry's products. They will be slaves on the land, doing the work they are ordered to do - against their own best wisdom - and paying out to industry against their will. There will be no way to be frugal, to grow one’s own grain to feed the animals, to raise healthy animals without GMO grains or drugs, to work with nature at all. Grassfed cattle and poultry and hogs will be finished. So, it’s obvious where control will take us. And weren’t these the “rumors on the internet” that were dismissed but are clearly the case?]

    * HR 2749 would give FDA the power to order a quarantine of a geographic area, including “prohibiting or restricting the movement of food or of any vehicle being used or that has been used to transport or hold such food within the geographic area.” [This - "that has been used to transport or hold such food" - would mean all cars that have ever brought groceries home so this means ALL TRANSPORTATION can be shut down under this. This is using food as a cover for martial law.] Under this provision, farmers markets and local food sources could be shut down, even if they are not the source of the contamination. The agency can halt all movement of all food in a geographic area. [This is also a means of total control over the population under the cover of food, and at any time.]

    * HR 2749 would empower FDA to make random warrantless searches of the business records of small farmers and local food producers, without any evidence whatsoever that there has been a violation. [If these bills cover all who "hold food" then this allows for taking of records of anyone at any time on no basis at all.] Even farmers selling direct to consumers would have to provide the federal government with records on where they buy supplies, how they raise their crops, and a list of customers.

    [NAIS for animals and all other foods?]

    * HR 2749 charges the Secretary of Health and Human Services with establishing a tracing system for food. Each “person who produces, manufactures, processes, packs, transports, or holds such food” [Is this not every home in the US?] would have to “maintain the full pedigree of the origin and previous distribution history of the food,” and “establish and maintain a system for tracing the food that is interoperable with the systems established and maintained by other such persons.” The bill does not explain how far the traceback will extend or how it will be done for multi-ingredient foods. With all these ambiguities, [with all these ambiguities, it is dangerous, period, separate from the money] it’s far from clear how much it will cost either the farmers or the taxpayers. [It is massive and absurd and burdensome beyond the capacity of people to comply - is this not fascism? - so it is a set up for being used to impose penalties endlessly and/or to eliminate anyone at will.]

    * HR 2749 creates severe criminal and civil penalties, including prison terms of up to 10 years and/or fines of up to $100,000 for each violation for individuals. [Does it include judicial review, Congressional oversight, a defined and limited set of penalties and punishments for a defined set of “crimes”? Or is it entirely ambiguous and left to the whim and sole power of “the Administrator”? Who is that person set to be? Is it Michael Taylor, Monsanto lawyer and executive, as Food Democracy has said? That is, do these bills set up an agency by which the entire US food supply will be turned over to the control of a multinational corporation under WTO regulations (and not to US farmers and not to US laws under the Constitution), with boundless freedom to do what it wants, and one infamous for harm to farmers and lack of safety of food?

    If it was not clear before how frightening these bills were, this small section of provisions, should make their actual fascism clear now. It goes way beyond “food safety” to absolute control over farms, animals, food, and us, including our movements and access to food at all.

    Action to Take:

    Contact your Representative now! Ask to speak with the staffer who handles food issues. Tell them you are opposed to the bill. Some points to make in telling your Representative why you oppose HR 2749 include:

    1. The bill imposes burdensome requirements while not specifically targeting the industrial food system and food imports, where the real food safety problems lie.

    2. Small farms and local food processors are part of the solution to food safety; lessening the regulatory burden on them will improve food safety.

    3. The bill gives FDA much more power than it has had in the past while making the agency less accountable for its actions.

    HR 2749 needs to be defeated!! Please take action NOW.

    To contact your Representative, use the finder tool at or send a message through the petition system (the petition will be on our website this evening) at Or call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

    To check the status of HR 2749, go to and type “HR 2749″ in the bill search field.

CBS Editorial Urges Internet Providers Remove “Hate Speech”

This is all a choreographed plan to eventually shut down the internet and curb your First Amendment rights. Does the government really believe that they can police your thoughts so that eventually murder is eradicated from the whole world? Of course not. It's all just another layer in the control grid.

    Kurt Nimmo
    June 17, 2009

    James von Brunn, the accused Holocaust museum shooter, has predictably become the poster child for attacking the First Amendment and conducting a purge of free speech on the internet.

    featured stories   CBS Editorial Urges Internet Providers Remove Hate Speech

    featured stories   CBS Editorial Urges Internet Providers Remove Hate Speech

    9/11 truth has "become a core part of the belief system of anti-Semites and millions of others around the world," according to ADL National Director Abraham H. Foxman.

    Christopher Wolf, chair of the Anti-Defamation League’s Internet Task Force and Immediate Past Chair of the International Network Against Cyber-Hate, writes that Web 2.0 technology has transformed “the way the Internet is being used. Any hater and propagandist can reach a mass audience, even an audience that didn’t think itself receptive to such hateful ideas. With the users of Web 2.0 comprised largely of younger people, the impact of the information posted there may persist for generations to come.”

    Web 2.0 is characterized as facilitating communication, information sharing, interoperability, and collaboration on the web. Examples include social-networking sites, video-sharing sites, wikis, and blogs.

    “Blogging and social media sites are changing the way people communicate their reactions to events in the news and interact with each other. Those who harbor anti-Semitic beliefs are comfortable expressing themselves in cyberspace, where they can provoke a reaction from others or find like-minded individuals to affirm their beliefs,” writes Wolf.

    Infowars and other truth and patriot movement web sites, according to the ADL, facilitate hatemongers such as Richard Poplawski, the accused Pittsburgh cop killer. “One of Poplawski’s favorite places for such conspiracy theories was the Web site of the right-wing conspiracy radio talk show host Alex Jones. Poplawski visited the site, Infowars, frequently, shared links to it with others, and sometimes even posted to it,” the ADL wrote April 8, 2009. Infowars utilizes Web 2.0 technology in the form of interactive commenting on news articles.

    On April 13, Infowars reported on the Department of Homeland Security’s “Rightwing Extremism” document. The DHS conflated white supremacists with activists opposed to gun control, abortion, and illegal immigration. An earlier report issued by the Missouri Information Analysis Center specifically denoted Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr supporters as potentially dangerous terrorists. The MIAC report also concentrated on white supremacists and militia groups.

Read all of it.

National Security Agency has ability to collect, read domestic e-mails of Americans on widespread basis

I gotta admit, I was duped. It was a whole other life, before I took the red pill. I really thought the government had better things to do than to spy on its own citizens. That was before I realized the government views us all as more dangerous than al Qaeda. So when they say they only want to spy on the terrorists, remember: YOU ARE THE TERRORIST. Don't be fooled again.

    New York Times

    WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged, current and former officials said.

    The agency’s monitoring of domestic e-mail messages, in particular, has posed longstanding legal and logistical difficulties, the officials said.

    Since April, when it was disclosed that the intercepts of some private communications of Americans went beyond legal limits in late 2008 and early 2009, several Congressional committees have been investigating. Those inquiries have led to concerns in Congress about the agency’s ability to collect and read domestic e-mail messages of Americans on a widespread basis, officials said. Supporting that conclusion is the account of a former N.S.A. analyst who, in a series of interviews, described being trained in 2005 for a program in which the agency routinely examined large volumes of Americans’ e-mail messages without court warrants. Two intelligence officials confirmed that the program was still in operation.

    Both the former analyst’s account and the rising concern among some members of Congress about the N.S.A.’s recent operation are raising fresh questions about the spy agency.

    Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey and chairman of the House Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, has been investigating the incidents and said he had become increasingly troubled by the agency’s handling of domestic communications.

    In an interview, Mr. Holt disputed assertions by Justice Department and national security officials that the overcollection was inadvertent.

    Some actions are so flagrant that they can’t be accidental,” Mr. Holt said.

    Other Congressional officials raised similar concerns but would not agree to be quoted for the record.

    Mr. Holt added that few lawmakers could challenge the agency’s statements because so few understood the technical complexities of its surveillance operations. “The people making the policy,” he said, “don’t understand the technicalities.”

    The inquiries and analyst’s account underscore how e-mail messages, more so than telephone calls, have proved to be a particularly vexing problem for the agency because of technological difficulties in distinguishing between e-mail messages by foreigners and by Americans. A new law enacted by Congress last year gave the N.S.A. greater legal leeway to collect the private communications of Americans so long as it was done only as the incidental byproduct of investigating individuals “reasonably believed” to be overseas.

    But after closed-door hearings by three Congressional panels, some lawmakers are asking what the tolerable limits are for such incidental collection and whether the privacy of Americans is being adequately protected.

    “For the Hill, the issue is a sense of scale, about how much domestic e-mail collection is acceptable,” a former intelligence official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because N.S.A. operations are classified. “It’s a question of how many mistakes they can allow.”

    While the extent of Congressional concerns about the N.S.A. has not been shared publicly, such concerns are among national security issues that the Obama administration has inherited from the Bush administration, including the use of brutal interrogation tactics, the fate of the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and whether to block the release of photographs and documents that show abuse of detainees.

    In each case, the administration has had to navigate the politics of continuing an aggressive intelligence operation while placating supporters who want an end to what they see as flagrant abuses of the Bush era.

    The N.S.A. declined to comment for this article. Wendy Morigi, a spokeswoman for Dennis C. Blair, the national intelligence director, said that because of the complex nature of surveillance and the need to adhere to the rules of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the secret panel that oversees surveillance operation, and “other relevant laws and procedures, technical or inadvertent errors can occur.”

    “When such errors are identified,” Ms. Morigi said, “they are reported to the appropriate officials, and corrective measures are taken.”

Continue reading...

Time for 'new world order': Brazilian President

You whackjob conspiracy theorists! There's no New World Order! Take off your tin foil hats and do something productive with your lives!! Never mind what Obama says about the NWO, it doesn't matter what Time Magazine or the Financial Times says about the NWO. The president of Brazil is talking about the NWO but you're all bat-shit CrAzY!!

    The global financial crisis has reduced the differences between nations and created the opportunity to form a new world order, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said Wednesday.

    Speaking after a meeting with Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev in the Kazakh capital Astana, Lula called on the global community to seize on the crisis to create a fairer world for developing nations.

    "I want to say that before the crisis, there were many countries which had greater significance than others, and some countries which had no significance at all," he said through a translator.

    "After the crisis, everyone has become similar. We have the possibility to create a new world order and together we should improve our relations."

    Lula arrived in Kazakhstan Wednesday following the first-ever summit between fellow developing economic powerhouses Russia, India and China -- together with Brazil dubbed the BRIC nations -- in the Russian city of Yekaterinburg.

    Nazarbayev, head of Central Asia's largest economy, is keen to secure a larger role for his government in world affairs.

    Following up on Lula's call, the pair said in a statement following their meeting that the United Nations should open up the UN Security Council to developing nations in an effort to bolster global security.

    They said that opening the organisation, which only has five permanent members, to wider membership was the only way to make the often-criticised body "more legitimate and effective."

Government to turn schools into mass vaccination clinics

What troubles me, and would trouble most people, were they capable of thinking, is the government's persistence in telling us that, while it is a relatively weak virus in its current form, it could always develop into a more virulent strain in the fall. A> how do they know this, and B> if the virus mutates, wouldn't that render any previously produced vaccine totally useless? For the love of God, do not consent to mandatory vaccinations for you or your children.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Schoolchildren could be first in line for swine flu vaccine this fall — and schools are being put on notice that they might even be turned into shot clinics.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said Tuesday she is urging school superintendents around the country to spend the summer preparing for that possibility, if the government goes ahead with mass vaccinations.

    "If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place," Sebelius told The Associated Press.

    No decision has been made yet on whether and how to vaccinate millions of Americans against the new flu strain that the World Health Organization last week formally dubbed a pandemic, meaning it now is circulating the globe unchecked. But the U.S. is pouring money into development of a vaccine in anticipation of giving at least some people the shots.

    While swine flu doesn't yet seem any more lethal than the regular flu that each winter kills 36,000 people in the U.S. alone, scientists fear it may morph into a more dangerous type. Even in its current form, the WHO says about half of the more than 160 people worldwide killed by swine flu so far were previously young and healthy.

    If that trend continues, "the target may be school-age children as a first priority" for vaccination, Sebelius said Tuesday. "That's being watched carefully."

    Schools do occasionally team up with local health officials for special flu vaccination clinics but it's not common. More than 140 schools around the country scheduled flu vaccination days last fall, some providing free vaccine. Some vaccinated only students bearing parent consent forms; others opened their doors to entire families.

    In a wide-ranging interview, Sebelius said it could take several years to meet President Barack Obama's top healthcare priority — covering the uninsured — even if Congress manages to pass legislation this fall.

    "Will something probably be phased in? You bet," Sebelius told The AP. It could take until 2011 or 2012 to set up new programs, time that would help spread out a cost that by some estimates would be $1 trillion over 10 years.

    Among the aims of the administration's planned overhaul is to help eliminate health disparities between minority groups and whites, "which frankly is unconscionable," Sebelius said.

    Hispanics and blacks are more likely to lack health insurance, and also have higher rates of a host of illnesses. But Sebelius said some of the most severe disparities are found with American Indians, and pledged a multiyear effort to reverse "a historic failure of the government." The U.S. is obligated to provide free health care on reservations, but the troubled Indian Health Service has only about half the money it needs.

    More immediately, Sebelius faces the looming question of whether to push forward with swine flu vaccinations this fall, on top of the regular winter flu vaccine that will be distributed as usual. A key challenge would be making people understand who needs which, or both, vaccines, decisions that will be made in part based on how swine flu behaves in the Southern Hemisphere this summer, where flu season is just beginning.

    Sebelius soon will call together the nation's governors to be sure "these months between now and the fall aren't used as vacation months" but in getting ready.

    "We can always sort of back off" if the new flu fades away, she said, "but we can't wait til October hits and say, 'Oh my heavens, what are we going to do?'"

    Companies are on track to provide pilot doses for testing later this summer, Sebelius said. Those government-led studies will check if the vaccine seems to work, if one dose or two will be needed, and most important if it's safe. The last mass vaccination against a different swine flu, in the U.S. in 1976, was marred by reports of a paralyzing side effect — for a feared outbreak that never happened.

    So the Food and Drug Administration will closely track vaccine safety, Sebelius said.

    The secretary said: "The worst of all worlds is to have the vaccine cause more damage than the flu potential."

Police departments with heavy artillery

Oh, how they gnash their teeth when I tell them police are becoming militarized adjuncts of the Pentagram. It upsets them greatly to "demonize" those who "protect and serve". In many cities in America, our police are no longer tasked with protecting and serving the citizens. They are tasked with occupying them and controlling the insurgents (American citizens). Why bother with Posse Comitatus when you can hire a bunch of veterans and give them tanks, grenade launchers, and assault rifles?

    WEST SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) - Like other law enforcers, West Springfield officers carry the usual handguns, handcuffs, pepper spray and ammunition.

    Unlike most police departments, this particular police force is also equipped with 2 grenade launchers, 4 M-14 semi-automatic rifles and one M-21 sniper rifle.

    According to the Boston Globe, West Springfield is one of 82 Massachusetts police departments that have obtained military surplus weapons over the last 15 years as part of a federal program.

    West Springfield Police Chief Thomas Burke told 22News, the grenade launchers can be used to fire tear gas in the event of a riot or a standoff.

    He says his officers are trained to use them if needed. "We haven't had to use this particular type of weapon but we have it in case we did," he said.

    Chief Burke added that taxpayers already paid for the guns and it would be a waste to have them destroyed.

    For the department, owning these weapons also means not having to wait for State Police to respond to a major emergency.

    The bottom line, he said it's better to be prepared than sorry.

    There are a handful of western Massachusetts police departments that have obtained military weapons from this federal program. Westfield has more than 30 rifles. Monson has 6 and Belchertown has 4.

AG Holder Urges Congress to Pass “Hate Crimes” Legislation

It's just a big ol' Constitution burning party in the Obama administration.

    (CBS/AP) Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday that recent killings show the need for a tougher U.S. hate crimes law to stop "violence masquerading as political activism."

    "Over the last several weeks, we have witnessed brazen acts of violence, committed in places that many would have considered unthinkable," Holder told the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs.

I mean, he's really serious. "Unthinkable." Is a murder in a home, or an office building, any worse a murder than in a church, or a museum? "Unthinkable!"

    The violence, he said, "reminds us of the potential threat posed by violent extremists and the tragedy that ensues when reasoned discourse is replaced by armed confrontation.

You mean like when a husband and wife argue, or when your boss fires you? Sometimes - rarely - they lead to murder too. How are you going to tackle that problem, Mr Holder? How do you more effectively prosecute those who commit violent attacks based on gender, disability, or sexual orientation? What more can you do to them than prosecute them for the murder laws we already have in the books? What are you going to do, execute them twice? Torture them? Here's the best part:

    "We will not tolerate murder, or the threat of violence, masquerading as political activism," Holder said. "So let me be clear, the Justice Department will use every tool at its disposal to protect the rights ensured under our Constitution."

How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words, said Samuel Adams. They'll protect your constitutional rights by trampling on your constitutional rights.

Dear Leader, Americans don't want socialized health care

Really, we don't. But thank you, for trying to run us off the cliff with your massive spending. Americans aren't buying the propaganda from your ministry of disinformation about how great socialized medicine is in Canada and Cuba. And we're sorry your little minions are confused and frustrated that Americans are rejecting Obama on this issue, even though they've rejected every president on this issue for 60 years. Damnit, don't we know Obama is different? We're sorry we don't think government would be very good at running a health plan. I mean, because government has done such a bang-up job with everything else it runs, like social security. We're sorry that we don't want over a trillion dollars piled onto your multi-trillion dollar deficits and the debt you've accumulated that we're never going to be able to pay. We're sorry - so, so sorry - that we don't trust people more interested in getting elected than in our health and well being to run our health care. With all due respect and praise, Dear Leader, thanks, but no thanks.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Are You Ready for War With Demonized Iran?

by Paul Craig Roberts

How much attention do elections in Japan, India, Argentina or any other country, get from the U.S. media? How many Americans and American journalists even know who is in political office in other countries besides England, France and Germany? Who can name the political leaders of Switzerland, Holland, Brazil, Japan or even China?

Yet, many know of Iran’s President Ahmadinejad. The reason is obvious. He is daily demonized in the U.S. media.

The U.S. media’s demonization of Ahmadinejad itself demonstrates American ignorance. The president of Iran is not the ruler. He is not the commander in chief of the armed forces. He cannot set policies outside the boundaries set by Iran’s rulers—the ayatollahs who are not willing for the Iranian Revolution to be overturned by American money in some color-coded “revolution.”

Iranians have a bitter experience with the U.S. government. Their first democratic election, after emerging from occupied and colonized status, in the 1950s was overturned by the U.S. government. The U.S. government installed in place of the elected candidate a dictator who tortured and murdered dissidents who thought Iran should be an independent country and not ruled by an American puppet.

The U.S. “superpower” has never forgiven the Iranian Islamic ayatollahs for the Iranian Revolution in the late 1970s, which overthrew the U.S. puppet government and held hostage U.S. embassy personnel, regarded as “a den of spies,” while Iranian students pieced together shredded embassy documents that proved America’s complicity in the destruction of Iranian democracy.

The government-controlled U.S. corporate media, a ministry of propaganda, has responded to the re-election of Ahmadinejad with nonstop reports of violent Iranian protests to a stolen election. A stolen election is presented as a fact, even though there is no evidence whatsoever. The U.S. media’s response to the documented stolen elections during the George W. Bush-Karl Rove era was to ignore the massive documented evidence of real stolen elections.

Leaders of the American puppet states of Great Britain and Germany have fallen in line with the American psychological warfare operation. Discredited British Foreign Secretary David Miliband expressed his “serious doubt” about Ahmadinejad’s victory to a meeting of European Union ministers in Luxembourg. Miliband, of course, has no source of independent information. He is simply following Washington’s instructions and relying on unsupported claims by the defeated candidate preferred by the U.S. government.

Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany, had her arm twisted, too. She called in the Iranian ambassador to demand “more transparency” on the elections.

Even the American left wing has endorsed the U.S. government’s propaganda. Writing in The Nation, Robert Dreyfuss presents the hysterical views of one Iranian dissident as if they are the definitive truth about “the illegitimate election,” terming it “a coup d’etat.”

What is the source of the information for the U.S. media and the American puppet states?

Nothing but the assertions of the defeated candidate, the one America prefers.

There is hard evidence to the contrary, however. An independent, objective poll was conducted in Iran by American pollsters prior to the election. The pollsters, Ken Ballen of the nonprofit Center for Public Opinion and Patrick Doherty of the nonprofit New America Foundation, describe their poll results in the June 15 Washington Post. The polling was funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and was conducted in Farsi “by a polling company whose work in the region for ABC News and the BBC has received an Emmy award.”

The poll results, the only real information we have at this time, indicate that the election results reflect the will of the Iranian voters. Among the extremely interesting information revealed by the poll is the following:

Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation, but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than two to one margin—greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday’s election.

While Western news reports from Tehran in the days leading up to the voting portrayed an Iranian public enthusiastic about Ahmadinejad’s principal opponent, Mir-Hossein Mousavi, our scientific sampling from across all 30 of Iran’s provinces showed Ahmadinejad well ahead.

The breadth of Ahmadinejad’s support was apparent in our pre-election survey. During the campaign, for instance, Mousavi emphasized his identity as an Azeri, the second-largest ethnic group in Iran after Persians, to woo Azeri voters. Our survey indicated, though, that Azeris favored Ahmadinejad by two to one over Mousavi.

Much commentary has portrayed Iranian youth and the Internet as harbingers of change in this election. But our poll found that only a third of Iranians even have access to the Internet, while 18- to 24-year-olds comprised the strongest voting bloc for Ahmadinejad of all age groups.

The only demographic groups in which our survey found Mousavi leading or competitive with Ahmadinejad were university students and graduates, and the highest-income Iranians. When our poll was taken, almost a third of Iranians were also still undecided. Yet the baseline distributions we found then mirror the results reported by the Iranian authorities, indicating the possibility that the vote is not the product of widespread fraud.

There have been numerous news reports that the U.S. government has implemented a program to destabilize Iran. There have been reports that the U.S. government has financed bombings and assassinations within Iran. The U.S. media treat these reports in a braggadocio manner as illustrations of the American superpower’s ability to bring dissenting countries to heel, while some foreign media see these reports as evidence of the U.S. government’s inherent immorality.

Pakistan’s former military chief, Gen. Mirza Aslam Beig, said on Pashto Radio on June 15 that undisputed intelligence proves the United States interfered in the Iranian election. “The documents prove that the CIA spent 400 million dollars inside Iran to prop up a colorful but hollow revolution following the election.”

The success of the U.S. government in financing color revolutions in former Soviet Georgia and Ukraine and in other parts of the former Soviet empire have been widely reported and discussed, with the U.S. media treating it as an indication of U.S. omnipotence and natural right and some foreign media as a sign of U.S. interference in the internal affairs of other countries. It is certainly within the realm of possibility that Mousavi is a bought-and-paid-for operative of the U.S. government.

We know for a fact that the U.S. government has psychological warfare operations that target both Americans and foreigners through the U.S. and foreign media. Many articles have been published on this subject.

Think about the Iranian election from a common sense standpoint. Neither I nor the vast majority of readers are Iranian experts. But from a common sense standpoint, if your country were under constant threat of attack, even nuclear attack, from two countries with much more powerful military establishments, as is Iran from the United States and Israel, would you desert your country’s best defender and elect the preferred candidate of the United States and Israel?

Do you believe that the Iranian people would have voted to become an American puppet state?

Iran is an ancient and sophisticated society. Much of the intellectual class is secularized. A significant, but small, percentage of the youth has fallen in thrall to Western sexual promiscuity, to personal pleasure and to self-absorption. These people are easily organized with American money to give their government and Islamic constraints on personal behavior the bird.

The U.S. government is taking advantage of these Westernized Iranians to create a basis for discrediting the Iranian election and the Iranian government.

On June 14, the McClatchy Washington Bureau, which sometimes attempts to report the real news, acquiesced to Washington’s psychological warfare and declared, “Iran election result makes Obama’s outreach efforts harder.” What we see here is the raising of the ugly head of the excuse for “diplomatic failure,” leaving only a military solution.

As a person who has seen it all from inside the U.S. government, I believe that the purpose of the U.S. government’s manipulation of the American and puppet government media is to discredit the Iranian government by portraying the Iranian government as an oppressor of the Iranian people and a frustrater of the Iranian people’s will. This is how the U.S. government is setting up Iran for military attack.

With the help of Mousavi, the U.S. government is creating another “oppressed people,” like Iraqis under Saddam Hussein, who require American blood and treasure to liberate. Has Mousavi, the American candidate in the Iranian election who was roundly trounced, been chosen by Washington to become the American puppet ruler of Iran?

The great macho superpower is eager to restore its hegemony over the Iranian people, thus settling the score with the ayatollahs who overthrew American rule of Iran in 1978.

That is the script. You are watching it every minute on U.S. television.

There is no end of “experts” to support the script. For one example among hundreds, we have Gary Sick, appropriately named, who formerly served on the National Security Council and currently teaches at Columbia University:

“If they’d been a little more modest and said Ahmadinejad had won by 51 percent,” Sick said, Iranians might have been dubious but more accepting. But the government’s assertion that Ahmadinejad won with 62.6 percent of the vote “is not credible.”

“I think,” continued Sick, “it does mark a real transition point in the Iranian Revolution, from a position of claiming to have its legitimacy based on the support of the population, to a position that has increasingly relied on repression. The voice of the people is ignored.”

The only hard information available is the poll referenced above. The poll found that Ahmadinejad was the favored candidate by a margin of two to one.

But as in everything else having to do with American hegemony over other peoples, facts and truth play no part. Lies and propaganda rule.

Consumed by its passion for hegemony, America is driven to prevail over others, morality and justice be damned. This world-threatening script will play until America bankrupts itself and has so alienated the rest of the world that it is isolated and universally despised.


Monday, June 15, 2009

What is the New World Order?

Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?

When The Matrix came out in 1999, I thought it was one of the most brilliant, ingenious ideas I'd ever seen - this concept that your reality could be fed to you by a computer and you'd be completely oblivious to the real world. What is real? If real is what you can feel, smell, taste and see, then 'real' is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. I've watched it, literally, hundreds of times over the last decade, but only recently did I recognize the real genius of this film, because it is an allegory for the world we live in today. The Matrix is the New World Order. It is the man behind the curtain, the shadow government. In the real world, the Matrix isn't a computer program being fed into your brain, it is an engineered psychological system of control that enslaves us all. How do they do it?

This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild once (im)famously said that if he could control a nation's currency, it wouldn't matter to him who made its laws. When you ponder this statement, it should be obvious to you that he was correct. In the real world, it's not the government or the citizens who run things, it is those who are in control the supply and value of our money. In this country, that control rests with the Federal Reserve.

But isn't the Federal Reserve part of the federal government? No. The Federal Reserve is about as federal as Federal Express - ie it is a private banking cartel that controls the value of our currency and the monetary policy of this country. Understand that the Fed has an infinite “supply” of money; there is no real money in its reserves, it just creates the money out of thin air and loans it out at interest. This is the key, because when you borrow money at interest, you have to pay back more money than you borrowed. But when the money you borrowed was created out of thin air, where does the money come from to pay the interest? You have to borrow more money! This perpetual compounding debt, for which the Fed was designed for, now has every man, woman and child in America on their hook for over $200,000. If the federal government balanced the budget tomorrow, it would still take generations to pay off that much debt. Consider the fact that currently our government runs budget deficits surpassing $2 trillion, and it becomes obvious our government will never pay this money back. This is the scam that has deprived the dollar of over 95% of its buying power since 1913, the year the Fed was created. What cost one dollar in 1913 now costs over $22. This is not simply the result of some natural rise in prices through the years. In fact, with innovations in technology, many things would cost less today, all things being equal.

But was this scam some sort of honest mistake by our forefathers that we are now unfortunately left to rectify? No, again. In 1907, JP Morgan spread a rumor that the Nickerbocker Bank was insolvent, which created a banking panic that spread throughout the entire industry. This engineered crisis was used as justification for the need of a central bank which would, it was claimed, eliminate the bank panic and the business cycle forever and bestow upon the American people perpetual economic growth and prosperity. No more banking panics, no more booms and busts; just steady, continuous growth. In the real world what we got was the biggest scam in the history of Western civilization: perpetual debt, perpetual boom-bust cycles, massive depressions, obscene theft and destruction of wealth.

In the wake of this banking panic, in 1910 the banking interests of the day, which include luminaries of the power elite still in control today, got together in secret on JP Morgan's private estate in Jekyll Island, Georgia. The conspirators gathered in total secrecy, under assumed names. No one could know the plot they were hatching. Here they conceived the Federal Reserve Act. Understand that this act was not written by the elected representatives of the day; it was written by banking elites, for banking elites.

From that point forward, booms and busts, prosperity and depression, inflation and deflation, have been, as Charles Lindberg put it, "worked out as we figure a mathematical equation." They create the boom, invest in it, then pull their money out, and create the bust. Then they buy up the spoils at pennies on the dollar, and inflate the bubble again, continuing the cycle. The business cycle is not naturally occurring events, they are contrived occurrences that make those on the inside monstrously rich, and allow them to continually consolidate their power and make heavier the yoke upon us all.

It is not a coincidence that the United States has been in a near non-stop state of war since the Fed's inception in 1913. Of all the crooked endeavors a nation can undertake, nothing enriches banking elites more than war. It is indeed a racket, and what I'm going to say now will shock you if you've yet to be unplugged from the Matrix: America has not involved itself in a single just war since that time. Begin with WWI, which we had absolutely no national interest in. Wilson wanted in to be the savior of mankind and to make the banksters rich. We entered the war on fraudulent pretenses, and negatively altered the course of world history for the next 100-plus years. Read the words of Churchill himself, in the New York Enquirer (August 1936):

    America should have minded her own business and stayed out of the World War. If you hadn't entered the war the Allies would have made peace with Germany in the Spring of 1917. Had we made peace then there would have been no collapse in Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in Italy followed by Fascism, and Germany would not have signed the Versailles Treaty, which has enthroned Nazism in Germany. If America had stayed out of the war, all these 'isms' wouldn't today be sweeping the continent of Europe and breaking down parliamentary government — and if England had made peace early in 1917, it would have saved over one million British, French, American, and other lives.

Surely we had just reason to enter WWII, having been sneak attacked by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor? You've been living in a dream-world, Neo. The attack by the Japanese was a contrived and designed event. By 1941 FDR had frozen all Japanese assets in the United States and coordinated a boycott of essential goods and services, particularly oil. Cutting off oil substantially increased the likelihood of war with Japan, and FDR knew it. Secretary of War Henry Stimson expressed this desire in his October 16, 1941 diary entry, saying, “We face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move - overt move.” And again on November 25, he wrote of the intent to “maneuver [Japan] into the position of firing the first shot.” Similarly, Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes wrote in his diary on October 16, 1941, "For a long time I have believed that our best entrance into the war would be by way of Japan." Navy Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, head of the Far East desk of the Office of Naval Intelligence, wrote a memorandum outlining 8 points of action for drawing the Japanese into an attack. All 8 points were implemented by Roosevelt. “If by these means Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better,” said McCollum.

Not only was a Japanese attack on America wanted, the exact place and date of the attack was known, and kept secret, by the Roosevelt administration. Japanese communication codes were cracked by American Army intelligence. Historian Charles Bateson wrote that "Magic (the security designation given to decoded Japanese transmissions) standing alone points so irresistibly to the Pearl Harbor attack that it is inconceivable anybody could have failed to forecast the Japanese move." The NSA reached the same conclusion in 1955. Britain, Netherlands, Australia, Peru, Korea and the Soviet Union all warned of an impending Japanese attack, but these were all ignored, so that, on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, American forces at Pearl Harbor were in a general state of calm as the Japanese task force approached. A day of infamy, indeed, but not because of a Japanese “surprise” attack on America. Roosevelt sacrificed over 2,400 American lives that day, to fight a war that would eventually cost over a quarter of a million more; a war that was never America’s war. It was Roosevelt’s. Wealthy elites like John Rockefeller made hundreds of millions on the war by funding both sides; Hitler's luftwaffe could not fly without a patented fuel additive from Rockefeller's Standard Oil. Typically we'd call that treason, but the war wasn't being fought for the security of the United States, it was fought to make people like Rockefeller a lot of money.

Not long after Eisenhower warned America about the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex, the power elite had dragged America into Vietnam. But Kennedy wanted out of Vietnam, and, at the time of his assassination was in the early stages of a plan to withdraw our troops from South-east Asia. He also signed executive order 11110, which limited the powers of the Federal Reserve and was a stepping stone to eliminate the institution completely. This obviously did not sit well with the elites, and his brutal murder serves as a reminder to anyone who doesn't tow their line. Every president since has been a complete and total puppet to the Federal Reserve and its military industrial complex. Not long after Kennedy was killed, an incident was staged in the Gulf of Tonkin which "provoked" the US into total war in Vietnam, in which over 58,000 Americans and over a million and a half Vietnamese were sacrificed for profit.

Later, the release of the Pentagon Papers, as well as the rules of engagement for Vietnam, made clear that the objective was never victory in Vietnam; the objective was sustainability. The war would be dragged on for as long as the government had the political will to sustain it, maximizing profits. Once critical mass was reached among the public, the war had to be ended, lest there be open revolt. Needless to say, in light of this (and many other false flag and black ops events our government engaged in), it should not be difficult to grasp that 9-11 was a false flag operation staged by our own government in order to justify the current wars we've been engaged in for several years now. First, remove the mental block that tells you it's not possible for our government to do such a thing, then examine the evidence, which is far too voluminous for me to document here. The truth becomes manifestly clear and inescapable.

If you've yet to be unplugged, you may be asking yourself, how is it I didn't know about these things? Or, you may be really plugged in and think that because the media and your history teachers didn't tell you these things, they must not be true. But, go back to the concept that whoever controls the money controls society. Now imagine the immense wealth and power these people have. Understand that many of these power elites are the owners of major media corporations. Rupert Murdoch. Ted Turner. Bill Gates. They're in control, and the media is bought and paid for by them. They are in fact nothing more than corporate mouthpieces for the power elite. And this is the real Matrix. They decide what reality they're going to inject into your brains, and those of us still plugged in have never experienced any reality except what they've been fed by the Matrix. And so we reject outright and with hostility - even violence - any ideas that challenge the worldview the Matrix has imbued in us. In this false reality, up is down, black is white, heroes are villains, villains are heroes. There's no way FDR knew about Pearl Harbor; he was an American! Only evil rulers from other countries do this, like Hitler burning his own parliament building and blaming it on communists. There's no way the Bush administration staged 9-11 to justify war in Afghanistan and Iraq; they're Americans! Americans may not be perfect, but we'd never do such a thing.

Meanwhile, we are medicated, against our will, with powerful neurotoxins that dumb us down and make us depressed and docile. They suck us of our humanity, our sense of self-worth, of free will. Fluoride, a toxin more powerful than lead, is put into our drinking water, weakening our bones, calcifying our arteries, sterilizing us, damaging the brain, disrupting the synthesis of certain neurotransmitters and receptors in nerve cells, leading to neural dysplasia, depression, and violent tendencies. We are injected with mercury and aluminum in our vaccines from the time we are born. Cases of autism skyrocket. Cases of Alzheimers increase, and at earlier and earlier ages. The Matrix tells us that mercury, a neurotoxin more powerful than lead, is actually beneficial to children with developing brains, despite lab tests that show mercury attacking and obliterating neurons. It told us melamine was safe for infant formula, despite 4 infant fatalities and 53,000 reported sick from melamine poisoning in China. Normal behavior is diagnosed as sickness and our children are forcibly drugged with powerful psychotropic substances that induce depression, suicide, and violent tendencies. Simply watch the commercials for many of these drugs; they are supposed anti-depressants, yet among the possible side effects are depression and suicidal tendencies. More than 75 percent of the psychotropic medication use for children is off-label, a practice of prescribing drugs for a purpose other than the approved use on its label.

Psychologist Daniel Elkind, in his 1981 classic The Hurried Child, discussed the increasing “industrialization” of our schools, with their regimented schedules, even at the elementary level, and their focus on turning out quality-controlled products, i.e., students. "Aggressive" behavior, such as playing tag or dodgeball, as well as high-fiving, are discouraged and banned. Males are becoming emasculated, and females have become hyper-feminine. In short, we have been deprived of our will and spirit to live free, and that includes our natural tendency to resist tyranny and oppression. Reality TV, celebrity obsession, and hyper-commercialized sporting events further opiate the masses.

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The Matrix has you. So poisoned are we with this reality that we see the evidence and we pretend it's not there. Orwell called this doublethink. We look at it, and it just doesn't register in our brains; we block it out. Or we read ludicrous explanations and accept them as obvious fact. If the FDA says mercury is safe for our children, where do I get in line for the shot? Why would they lie? Or, if your denial is deep enough, you refuse to even look at the evidence, because any such a conspiracy must be the delusions of the mentally ill, and that is the end all, be all. Because once you're willing to accept truth of a horror of this magnitude, it's as if you've exited the womb into a terrifying new world. The world, to you, never looks the same again. You can't turn on your TV and see what you saw before. You can't listen to the president, or a congressman, speak without hearing lies. You see lies everywhere. The truth, literally, sets you free.

Welcome to the real world.

Round up ‘hate speech’ promoters?

Your free speech must be infringed, you see, because you are too easily misled. You are sheep. You are mindless drones. When you hear someone spreading "hate speech", your brain shuts down, as if you're under the control of some kind of powerful alien mind control, and you are compelled to kill people. Don't think; your government will think for you.

    David Codrea
    The Examiner
    June 14, 2009

    CBS News and U.S. News have posted a stunning, disturbing opinion piece by Bonnie Erbe. Here’s who she is, for those of you who may not be familiar with her work:

    Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS’s weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

    Top credentials. Her voice is loud and reaches far. Here’s what it’s saying:

    Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks

    Erbe takes her lead from a statement made by Playwright Janet Langhart Cohen on CNN following the Holocaust Museum shooting:

    She said something must be done about ridding the Internet and the public dialogue of hate speech. I agree.

    And what is that “something”?

    Isn’t it time we started rounding up promoters of hate before they kill?

    I don’t know, Bonnie, is it? Who is going to determine who the haters are? And without a Department of PreCrime, who can determine when one of them will kill? Who is going to be doing the round up? Are we going to maybe house them at Gitmo now that we’re clearing that place out? Any trials planned in your little fantasy?

    And what do you suggest “we” do if some decide to resist the “round ups”?

    Why is it your “Final Solution”…I mean, “Last Roundup” to oppose neo-Nazism sounds just like something the Nazis would do, Bonnie?

    I saw this coming when I wrote “Holocaust Museum shooting must not be exploited to erode liberty” the other day, citing a blogger on a popular left-wing site and expressing concern that it represented the tip of an iceberg. As we can see, it hasn’t taken long for mainstream “authorized journalists” to take up the cause.

    I note the chilling Ms. Erbe is affiliated with the Thomas Jefferson Street blog. I can’t help but wonder what she’d have to say about an extreme insurrectionist promulgating violent views like this:

    the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.

    If Ms. Erbe and those like her get their wish, we will find out how deep that tree’s roots go, how wide its branches spread.

    So who am I siding with, the haters?

    From where I sit, that designation belongs to Ms. Erbe. And as far a neo-Nazis go, I can’t help but notice many of her political sympathies appear both national and socialist in scope.

    My friend and colleague Mike Vanderboegh has sized things up well in his open letter to Erbe:

    You wish to sweep away those that you find “hateful.” Have you ever considered that there are many who find your ideas “hateful?”

    Most of the Founders understood that you should never pass a law that you wouldn’t be willing to see enforced upon you by your own worst enemy. (John Adams didn’t, but then he and his party were swept from power by the reaction to the Alien and Sedition Acts.) If you really believe what you wrote, and worse, get what you ask for, the resulting armed resistance to such a tyrannical proposal would sweep away the safe, mythical cocoon within which you seem to live.

    And if you think that tyranny and civil war cannot come to this country, as divided ideologically and morally as we presently are, you are whistling past the graveyard of history.

    A government that would do what Bonnie Erbe demands is the very reason Thomas Jefferson wrote:

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…

    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

    “Throw off.”

    And how would they do that?