Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Airports To Screen Passengers For H1N1 Symptoms

The slaves love it. "I'm all for it!" Just like they love stripping down for TSA goons, letting the perverts grope their wives and daughters, and walking through scanners that lets them see them naked. They love it, and they thank them for it. Never mind that even the media is now forced to report that there is no second resurgence of the swine flu, because it's a weak virus. Relinquish your rights anyway. Get the vaccine, and let them take your temperature before you get on the plane. It's all FYOG.

    CBS News -

    With the holiday season just a few weeks away, health officials fear the swine flu will pick up right along with air travel.

    New government guidelines are on their way, designed to help keep passengers healthy.

    This flu season, airport staff across the nation won't just be screening for security threats. They'll also be looking out for health threats – people who look like they may have the H1N1 virus.

    The government says that people traveling internationally may be screened for the H1N1 virus as they leave or enter the U.S.

    "It feels a little bit overboard," Stanford, Conn. resident Derek Ferguson said.

    The government warns that some passengers may be asked to pass through a screening device, have their temperatures taken, answer questions about their health, and even be quarantined if someone on the flight shows symptoms of H1N1.

    "I'm all for it, I really am," Mount Vernon resident Rosa Raspaldo said. "Because – guaranteed – if people are coughing on the plane, all of those germs will be spread around."

    But the H1N1 virus isn't just a danger in the skies. Buses and trains can also be a breeding ground for germs. Millions of riders climb aboard every day, and that has many taking precautions.

    "I keep antiseptic in my purse and I use it all the time," said New York City resident Rose Donato.

    Donato is a daily commuter, and says she isn't relying on others to take responsibility for her health.

    "We're in Grand Central – I'm sure there are people that are sick and are walking around, and are spraying their germs all over the place," Donato said.

    New York, along with other transportation agencies around the country, is posting signs reminding customers to keep their sneezes and coughs to themselves. It's common sense advice that doctors echo.

    "Get vaccinated, wash your hands frequently, and you've really done the most that almost anybody can do to protect against influenza," Dr. Michael Phillips, of New York University's Langone Medical Center, said.

    The first doses of swine flu vaccine arrived earlier this week, but new polls show that many people don't plan to get it. Flu shot or not, experts say that healthy habits will help make sure that, when you travel, germs don't take the trip with you.

    If you have questions about the swine flu, check out our online resource guide here, including what you need for a swine flu survival kit. You can also check out information on screenings for travelers here.

NYPD tracking cell phone owners, but foes aren't sure practice is legal

This is how they get away with this. Instead of stating the obvious - that this is a blatant 4th amendment violation - they say, "Well, we're not really sure if it's illegal, but it's alarming." And then instead of curbing the government's power, they rip each others' eyes out over the legality, and the establishment just laughs at them as the program advances under their noses.
    NY Daily News -

    The NYPD is amassing a database of cell phone users, instructing cops to log serial numbers from suspects' phones in hopes of connecting them to past or future crimes.

    In the era of disposable, anonymous cell phones, the file could be a treasure-trove for detectives investigating drug rings and other criminal enterprises, police sources say.

    "It's used to help build cases," one source said of the new initiative.

    "It doesn't replace the human element, like debriefing prisoners, but it's another tool to use that we didn't have in the past."

    A recent internal memo says that when cops make an arrest, they should remove the suspect's cell phone battery to avoid leakage - then jot down the International Mobile Equipment Identity number.

    The IMEI number is registered with the service provider whenever a call is made.

    And that data could allow a detective to match, for example, a cell phone used by one suspect to a phone used by another.

    There are limits to the data's usefulness - all Chinese-made cells sold in India have the same number and some overseas cells are embedded with fake numbers.

    Still, civil libertarians are alarmed by the new policy since normally a warrant is needed to obtain information such as calls made or numbers in an address book.

    New York Civil Liberties Union associate legal director Christopher Dunn said it appears the NYPD is "taking phones apart to get information" without warrants.

    "It's hard to believe they feel there's a real need to take out the battery to prevent leakage," he said. "Instead, it looks like they're doing this to circumvent the warrant process."

    The cell phone information joins another database of more than 20 million 911 callers that the NYPD has been building. It has paid off.

    In one case involving a 911 call, detectives solved a burglary pattern after the suspect left a slip of paper with his cell number on it at a crime scene, Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne said.

    The phone was disposable so no owner information was available, but police were able to track it to the suspect because he had used it to make a 911 call after he was assaulted.

    The NYPD started collecting 911 data for incidents involving a police response in 2003. Four years ago, it began putting the information into its new computer nerve center, the Real Time Crime Center.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

TSA to expand use of body scanners

People really think this is a good idea. Really. They think some TSA pervert, who is too inept to hold a real job, looking at the virtual naked body of their wives or daughters or girlfriends, or themselves, is a good thing. Because, you know, someone might sneak a boxcutter on board, or, true story, a fish hook, and use it to bring an entire nation to its knees. I know, I laugh too.

But we shouldn't, because this is serious. And they are going to keep pressing their boots on our necks, harder and harder, until we stand up and say 'enough!' How much humiliation are we going to cheerfully endure? Is it our patriotic duty to be degraded? To be treated with perpetual suspicion, a suspect every moment for the rest of our lives? Where is the line we're not willing to cross? Is it a cavity search?

    WASHINGTON — The Transportation Security Administration plans to install 150 security machines at airport checkpoints that enable screeners to see under passengers' clothes.

    The installation will vastly expand the use of the controversial body scanners, which can reveal hidden bombs and knives. But the devices have been labeled as intrusive by some lawmakers. The House of Representatives in June overwhelmingly passed a measure that would restrict their use by the TSA to passengers flagged by other types of screening, such as metal detectors. The measure is pending in the Senate.

    TSA spokeswoman Kristin Lee said the machines are "critical" to stopping terrorists with homemade bombs that may elude metal detectors. The agency hasn't decided which airports will get the machines, Lee said.

    The $100,000 scanners shoot low-intensity X-rays that penetrate clothing, bounce off a person's skin and create images that show solid objects as dark areas. The TSA machines have privacy additions to create images that look like etchings. Screeners view them on a monitor in a locked room near a checkpoint and delete them immediately after viewing.

    "Body imaging is a total invasion of privacy," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, who proposed the restriction. "You don't need this kind of scrutiny."

    Although the machines use X-rays, a 2003 report by the National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements, which Congress created to develop radiation guidelines, said people can safely be scanned by the machines up to 2,500 times a year.

    "Imaging technology is safe," Lee said.

    The TSA used $25 million from the federal stimulus package to buy the scanners from California-based Rapiscan Systems. The agency is using an additional $22 million to buy 500 upgraded machines that scan bottles for liquid explosives.

    The TSA has been testing scanners since early 2007, mostly on passengers who set off a metal-detector alarm and are taken aside for additional screening. The new scanners will be installed beginning early next year and will be used in place of metal detectors at checkpoints.

    Passengers may choose to avoid the scanners and be screened by a metal detector, but those who do will be pulled aside for a pat-down, Lee said.

    American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Christopher Calabrese said using the scanners in place of metal detectors "is unquestionably a step in the direction of having these machines be mandatory."