Friday, October 30, 2009

Clinton faces Pakistani anger at Predator attacks

What, isn't the slaughtering of innocents what freedom is all about? Isn't this incontrovertible proof of our benevolence? Lighten up!
    Associated Press -

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton came face-to-face Friday with Pakistani anger over U.S. aerial drone attacks in tribal areas along the Afghan border, a strategy that U.S. officials say has succeeded in killing key terrorist leaders.

    In a series of public appearances on the final day of a three-day visit marked by blunt talk, Clinton refused to discuss the subject, which involves highly classified CIA operations. She would say only that "there is a war going on," and the Obama administration is committed to helping Pakistan defeat the insurgents and terrorists who threaten the stability of a nuclear-armed nation.

    Clinton said she could not comment on "any particular tactic or technology" used in the war against extremist groups in the area.

    The use of Predator drone aircraft, armed with guided missiles, is credited by U.S. officials with eliminating a growing number of senior terrorist group leaders this year who had used the tribal lands of Pakistan as a haven beyond the reach of U.S. ground forces in Afghanistan.

    During an interview broadcast live in Pakistan with several prominent female TV anchors, before a predominantly female audience of several hundred, one member of the audience said the Predator attacks amount to "executions without trial" for those killed.

    Another asked Clinton how she would define terrorism.

    "Is it the killing of people in drone attacks?" she asked. That woman then asked if Clinton considers drone attacks and bombings like the one that killed more than 100 civilians in the city of Peshawar earlier this week to both be acts of terrorism.

    "No, I do not," Clinton replied.

    Earlier, in a give-and-take with about a dozen residents of the tribal region, one man alluded obliquely to the drone attacks, saying he had heard that in the United States, aircraft are not allowed to take off after 11 p.m., to avoid irritating the population.

    "That is the sort of peace we want for our people," he said through an interpreter.

    The same man told Clinton that the Obama administration should rely more on wisdom and less on firepower to achieve its aims in Pakistan.

    "Your presence in the region is not good for peace," he said, referring to the U.S. military, "because it gives rise to frustration and irritation among the people of this region." At another point he told Clinton, "Please forgive me, but I would like to say we've been fighting your war."

    A similar point was made by Sana Bucha of Geo TV during the live broadcast interview.

    "It is not our war," she told Clinton. "It is your war." She drew a burst of applause when she added, "You had one 9/11. We are having daily 9/11s in Pakistan."

    Capturing a feeling that Clinton heard expressed numerous times during her visit, one woman in the audience said, "The whole world thinks we are terrorists." The woman said she was from the South Waziristan area where the Pakistani army is engaged in pitched battles with Taliban and affiliated extremist elements - and where U.S. drones have struck with deadly effect many times.

Exaggerated claims undermine drive to cut emissions, scientists warn

Exaggerations are necessary when perpetrating a myth, but the alarmists have gone so far overboard that moderate scare tactics and lies don't take hold. So as people, especially in America, fall off the global warming bandwagon due in part to absurdities like twenty-foot sea level rises and humans migrating to Antarctica and resorting to cannibalism, scientists just want us to believe moderate lies about climate, such as that a warmer climate would be bad - really bad - for life on earth, even though the climate has been warmer in the past, for longer, and never resulted in any civilizational calamity or mass extinction. The goal is to dupe us into willingly giving up everything we own, and submit to population control, including mass genocide (if only for *other* people). Let's tone it down a bit, 'kay?

    Times of London -

    Exaggerated and inaccurate claims about the threat from global warming risk undermining efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions and contain climate change, senior scientists have told The Times.

    Environmental lobbyists, politicians, researchers and journalists who distort climate science to support an agenda erode public understanding and play into the hands of sceptics, according to experts including a former government chief scientist.

    Excessive statements about the decline of Arctic sea ice, severe weather events and the probability of extreme warming in the next century detract from the credibility of robust findings about climate change, they said.

    Such claims can easily be rebutted by critics of global warming science to cast doubt on the whole field. They also confuse the public about what has been established as fact, and what is conjecture.

    The experts all believe that global warming is a real phenomenon with serious consequences, and that action to curb emissions is urgently needed.

    They fear, however, that the contribution of natural climate variations towards events such as storms, melting ice and heatwaves is too often overlooked, and that possible scenarios about future warming are misleadingly presented as fact.

    “I worry a lot that NGOs [non=governmental organisations] are very much in the habit of doing exactly that,” said Professor Sir David King, director of the Smith School for Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford, and a former government chief scientific adviser.

    “When people overstate happenings that aren’t necessarily climate change-related, or set up as almost certainties things that are difficult to establish scientifically, it distracts from the science we do understand. The danger is they can be accused of scaremongering.

US government report recommends blocking popular websites during pandemic flu outbreak

Tyranny doesn't like the free flow of information. How can they perpetrate their lives when they can't control the opposition? They control what's taught in the schools. They control what's reported in the media. They can't control what's said in the alternative press, which thrives on the internet and AM radio. Is it a coincidence that the government is making aggressive moves to clamp down on both?

    NaturalNews -

    The US government has issued a new report that recommends blocking access to popular websites during a pandemic outbreak in order to preserve internet bandwidth for investors, day traders and securities clearing house operations. The concern is that a pandemic would cause too many people to stay at home and download YouTube videos and porn, hogging all the internet bandwidth and blocking throughput for investment activities, thereby causing a stock market meltdown.

    This isn't an April Fool's joke. It's all based on a public report issued by the Government Accounting Office (GAO), available from their website at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d108.pdf

    In this article, I'm going to explain how a pandemic outbreak could theoretically bring down Wall Street. But to get to that, you'll first need to find out what the GAO said in its curious report (see below). Parts of this article are presented as satire, but the underlying facts quoted here are all true and verifiable (links are provided to all sources).

    This report in question is entitled, "GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, INFLUENZA PANDEMIC" and includes this subtitle: Key Securities Market Participants Are Making Progress, but Agencies Could Do More to Address Potential Internet Congestion and Encourage Readiness.

    As the report explains:

    In a severe pandemic, governments may close schools, shut down public transportation systems, and ban public gatherings such as concerts or sporting events. In such scenarios, many more people than usual may be at home during the day, and Internet use in residential neighborhoods could increase significantly as a result of people seeking news, entertainment, or social contact from home computers. Concerns have been raised that this additional traffic could lead to congestion on the Internet that would significantly affect businesses in local neighborhoods, such as small doctors' offices or business employees attempting to telework by connecting to their employers' enterprise networks.

    Can Hulu, Twitter and porn destroy Wall Street?

    To translate this concern of the GAO, what they're saying is that if too many people stay home and use the internet, Wall Street might not be able to function smoothly. Therefore, in order to protect Wall Street (because as you know, our government does everything possible to bail out Wall Street), the feds might need to shut down some popular websites.

    But where, exactly, is all the bandwidth usage really coming from? Twitter uses virtually no bandwidth, given that it's a short, text-based messaging service. Text articles also don't use up much bandwidth. In terms of clogging the internet's "series of tubes" (to use a hilarious term coined by a U.S. Senator), the real culprits are videos. While a Twitter text message might be less than 1k in size, a typical video is 350MB, or roughly 350,000 times larger than a Twitter message.

    So where, exactly, are people getting video downloads? The most popular non-porn video destinations today are MySpaceTV.com, YouTube.com, LiveLeak.com, Yahoo Video and Hulu.com. But as it turns out, even these highly popular websites may not account for most internet traffic.

Continue reading...

Thursday, October 29, 2009

The Final Countdown

Those of us fighting the New World Order now have to recognize that the New World Order is here. The beachhead has been established, and they are landing invasion forces. There is no time for arguing, no time for debate, no time for bickering. This isn't a debate about science, like global warming, where the globalists tell us we have to shove aside scientific inquiry and err on the side of hysteria. The corporate takeover is complete, and all that is left for them is to rob the American people of what wealth they have left, and implement the police state control grid they've been constructing for years.

This isn't a call to arms, a plea for violence. This is a call to awareness, a plea for consciousness. It's time to wake up. My friends, the greatest weapon the globalists have against us is not their grotesque weapons of war. It's not bullets and bombs, tanks and stealth warplanes. It's not their microwave emitters, their LRADs. It's not their militarized police, or the troops they've begun stationing on our own shores. The globalists, masters of psychological warfare, have, over the decades, through indoctrination in public schools and universities, and their controlled media, taught us to enslave ourselves to them, to adore our bondage, and to defend it. We are taught to worship authority, bow down to power, and loathe ourselves to the point that we have zero confidence in our own innate ability to think for ourselves. Authority always knows better. The doctors who poison you, the police who oppress you, the media that lies to you, the schools that indoctrinate you, always know better than you. Anything outside that paradigm has now become "terrorism". Those of us awakened know authority is not the truth. Truth is the authority.

The revolution is a revolution of consciousness. Once we realize we're slaves, we need only to stop participating in this phony, corrupt system, and their house of cards collapses. There's not an army they can muster big enough to stop it; a million bombing sorties won't prevent us from being free. Like the movie A Bug's Life, the illusion must be perpetrated that we are weak, we are helpless, and we are dependent. Once we realize we outnumber the globalists exponentially, and that all we need to do is stop giving them our money, stop giving them power, stop laying down before them so they can put their boots on our necks, they will hop on their yachts and run for their lives, cowards that they are.

Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves.

- Andrew Jackson, commenting on the Second Bank of the United States, forerunner to the Federal Reserve

To me it is obvious that what needs to be destroyed first is the corrupt Federal Reserve system. All other methods of oppression and enslavement become impossible without the Fed's printing press. Without a fiat currency, the government loses control of the media. Education. The imperialistic war machine. The war on drugs. The police, which have now become militarized adjuncts of the Pentagon. Without the Fed, this grotesque leviathan withers and dies, until little is left except the basic fundamentals of governance, as the Constitution originally intended. Throughout our nation's history, the central bank has been at the heart of the battle between Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians, with Hamiltonians desperate for a central bank to fund a powerful central government, and Jeffersonians fighting for sound money, small, limited government, and liberty. We have no chance for liberty so long as the Federal Reserve exists and acts as the shadow government of this country, and our slave masters.

It can never be overstated what the Fed is and how it enslaves us. It is not part of our constitutionally-established federal government. In fact, the constitution bans such an institution, and bestows the power to coin money upon congress alone. The Fed is a private banking cartel, no more "federal" than Federal Express. It has within its power the ability to create money out of thin air - our money - and then loan that money to us, the people, at interest. If the money is created out of thin air and loaned at interest, where does the money come from to pay for the interest once the principle of the loan is payed off? Obviously, the interest cannot be paid without borrowing more money. And this is the fraud inherent in this system: perpetual, compounding debt, which can only be sustained so long as the currency has any value. However, since the inception of the Fed in 1913, the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value, and as the world continues to dump the dollar as their reserve currency, and China and other nations dump our treasury bonds, forcing us to print more and more money to sustain our spending, the dollar is in its death throes, and that spells disaster for the American people.

Put simply, there is no movement that can claim to carry the mantle for liberty that doesn't have at its core the demand to abolish the private Federal Reserve and ban central banking from this country until the end of time.

It also cannot be overstated that this calamity, being inbred in the Federal Reserve system, was an engineered disaster - as Charles Lindbergh put it, a "scientifically created one, worked out as we figure a mathematical equation." Many would ask why they would purposely want to destroy the economy and completely wipe out the middle class throughout the world. Don't they make their money off the backs of the middle class? It has to be understood that money is nothing more than a means to an end, and that end is power. If they're able to achieve their goal of ultimate power, ultimate control, what use to them is money? What really matters is resources and land - tangible items - and as ultimate rulers of the world they can take what they please. With all of the wealth and resources under their control, the plebs will be totally impoverished and utterly dependent on the globalists to provide for them. The more dependent we are on the State, the more willing we will be to accept our slavery, even as it becomes so overbearing that we can no longer deny its existence.

This is a scenario from the not too distant future. While they are sucking the wealth from what's left of the middle class, they are moving quickly to disarm us. They are moving to take total control over agriculture, so that organic farmers will be forced to use poisonous pesticides, making them more reliant on genetically modified seeds, which are also toxic. It will be illegal to grow your own garden on your own property. They will ban vitamins and supplements, so that a prescription will be needed just to take vitamin C. Anything and everything the government can do to make us more dependent on them, they are doing. This includes damaging our brains, denying us a real education, and making us sick by denying us the ability to eat healthy. If you are self-sufficient and armed, there is little need for government; concurrently, the more helpless and desperate you are, the more your need for government, even one that is tyrannical and cruel.

Knowing this, what you can do as an individual is clear. Take an inventory of every aspect of your life that is currently beyond your control. What would happen to you if the power grid collapses? Where will you get your food and water from? What will you do when the currency completely collapses, and you can no longer afford to feed you and your family? What will you do when other people, in their desperation, come to your home looking to take from you what's yours? Can you defend yourself?

I am certainly no expert on survival. But I do know that the more self-sufficient you are, the more easily you can survive the coming anarchy. This is a small inventory of current or future plans to prepare myself and my family for survival:

  • Store food and water. Most of us still have jobs, and don't have enough time to maintain a garden. Many of us do not have adequate land for growing food. So while a stash of heirloom seeds are absolutely essential, enough food should be put aside to sustain yourselves while you adjust to dramatic changes in your life, such as a massive collapse of our economy and society.
  • Buy heirloom seeds. Heirloom seeds are non-hybrid, non-genetically modified seeds. Along with the fruits and vegetables you will be able to harvest, you will be able to collect their seeds so that you can grow them again the next season, giving you a virtually endless supply of nutrient-rich foods. I've bought my seeds from SurvivalistSeeds.com.
  • Invest in water. Like food, in an economic and social collapse, your ability to procure drinking water will be extremely restricted. If you don't have a water supply - river, lake, etc - nearby, you'll need to find an alternative source. To my knowledge, that leaves you with two options: rain water collection, or atmospheric water generator. Keep in mind that an atmospheric water generator will require power. I'm planning on buying an Ecoloblue atmospheric water generator.
  • Buy firearms and stock up on ammo. Protect your family, not only from the social calamity that will ensue, but from the State, which will be displeased by your ability to exist without their sanction. In the near future, the State will make it increasingly difficult to buy ammo. This has already happened in California. So, like heirloom seeds, stock up on ammo now while you still have the ability to do so legally. Take into account the gun's ability to stop an intruder, as well as hunt for game.
  • Get off the grid. If you own a home, invest in solar and wind generators. They are surprisingly cheap to build yourself. This makes sense even if there were no impending collapse; why would you pay for power when it's available in abundance for free? Paying for energy in this day and age is like paying to breathe air. Actually that's kind of what the cap and trade bill and Copenhagen Treaty will do to you. I digress. Fortunately the government doesn't presume to own the sun. Yet. For people like me, who don't own a home, I recommend a solar powered generator. This won't power everything in your home, but it will allow you to keep essentials such as your refrigerator running.
  • Learn essential survival skills. Prepare for the worst case scenario. To me, the worst case scenario is you have to abandon your home and flee to a safe location, with little except your clothes and whatever food, water, weapons, and tools you can carry. The more skills you possess the better your chances of survival; if you know enough, you can live a life of relative comfort and luxury. Learn how to build a house or log cabin. Learn how to farm/garden. Learn how to can and store vegetables and fruits. Learn how to butcher game and fish. Learn how to build solar panels and wind generators. Collect the tools and implements you'll need for each of these skills.
  • Buy books and bookmark websites on survival. I personally own the SAS Survival Handbook and This Book Will Save Your Life. Download as many survival podcasts as you can. Search for websites or books on edible wild plants. Download the Army Field Manual for survival. You can never have enough resources at your disposal.

Maybe the worst case scenario happens, maybe it doesn't. Before dismissing the possibility, consider how impossible our current calamity seemed just five years ago. If you were plugged in and ignorant like me, the thought never entered your mind, and you would've laughed at and berated anyone who warned you about it. We are no longer ignorant, and can no longer afford to live as if we're ignorant, as if we don't know that America is not immune to the horrors of history that have always seemed to occur in far-off lands. It is America's turn to suffer; we are not exceptional. Hope for the best, prepare for the end of the world.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Foreign Cops Take Part in “Domestic Terrorism” Drill in California

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
October 23, 2009

Earlier in the week, Chris Matthews attempted to portray Stewart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers as a paranoid conspiracy nut for suggesting the presence of foreign troops in the United States.

featured stories   Foreign Cops Take Part in Domestic Terrorism Drill in California

jobs



France’s RAID or Les Hommes en Noir — the Men in Black, appropriate for a militarized police unit.


Matthews, as a supposed news anchor, should read the newswires instead of relying on his CIA Mockingbird script. But then, of course, MSNBC is not interested in reporting the news.

On October 22, two days after his disgraceful attack on the Oath Keepers, The Oakland Tribune reported on just that — foreign troops inside the United States.

“Armed officers in full battle gear will be scattered throughout the Bay Area this weekend, rescuing hostages, fighting bank robbers and quelling terrorism at the Oakland Airport, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, the NASA Ames Research Center and 22 other high profile sites,” writes Sophia Kazmi. “For the first time in the three-year history of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department-sponsored exercise, there will be a foreign team of officers taking part and international observers. An eight-member team representing the French National Police’s Research, Assistance, Intervention, and Dissuasion unit will compete” (emphasis added).

French police are technically speaking not troops. However, the French RAID unit — Recherche Assistance Intervention Dissuasion (Research, Assistance, Intervention, Deterrence) — is a militarized SWAT team that uses special forces techniques. It is accused of triple tapping a mentally disturbed man who took school children hostage in 1993. RAID killed the man while he slept.

It is interesting to note how terrorism is conflated with bank robbery in the article. It’s part of a federal effort to characterize all crime — from marijuana possession to bank robbery — as terrorism.

“There will be the sound of gunfire and blasts — all part of Urban Shield, one of the biggest domestic terrorism drills in the country. The $1 million, two-day event begins Saturday and will test the training of 27 crack teams from throughout the state, elsewhere in the country and the world,” the Tribune article reports.

Urban Shield is funded by the Department of Homeland Security and at least one large corporation — BAE, a death merchant based in Britain. BAE stands accused of paying millions of dollars in bribes to secure contracts in Africa and Eastern Europe.

BAE’s “generous contributions” to Urban Shield will get the residents of Alameda County acclimated to the “sound of gunfire and blasts” and the presence of militarized cops “in full battle gear ” roaming the streets of the Bay Area this weekend.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Soros calls Wall St profits ‘gifts’ from state

(The depression) is in a way a culminating point of my life's work, so to speak ... it is actually a very stimulating period. - George Soros

Will this spark outrage? No. Because the masses are too programmed and dumbed down to notice or care about government criminal activity, even when they rub it in our faces and laugh about it. Everything - everything - is hidden in plain view. It's as if it's a bit of a game to the establishment: just how much open, blatant criminal activity can they conduct with impunity? A great deal, apparently.

    Financial Times -

    The big profits made by some of Wall Street’s leading banks are “hidden gifts” from the state, and taxpayer resentment of such companies is “justified”, George Soros, the fund manager, said in an interview with the Financial Times.

    “Those earnings are not the achievement of risk-takers,” Mr Soros said. “These are gifts, hidden gifts, from the government.”

New York suspends mandatory flu shots for health workers

They have rights? Excuse me? What rights might those be? Yes, sovereign, free human beings have the right to refuse to be experimented on. They have a right to not be forcibly medicated. They have a right to keep themselves healthy without the crutch of medical quackery. They have a right to say modern medicine is not infallible. They have a right to think, and to choose.

Of course, it's not because they have said rights. No no no. It's because there's not enough vaccine to go around. And though the establishment has claimed ad nauseum that health care workers needed to be vaccinated most of all because they came into contact with too many people, now it has become a priority to vaccinated everyone else, and leave the healthcare workers "unprotected".

And then they wonder why nobody takes them seriously.

Obviously, the establishment in New York is making an excuse for its previous and impending defeat in the courts. They want them to know, it has nothing to do with them asserting themselves as free individuals. No, they're still slaves; they're just off the hook because there's not enough to go around.

    CNN -

    New York public health workers will no longer be required to be vaccinated against both the seasonal and H1N1 flu virus, state officials announced Thursday, prompted by a vaccine shortage.

    A statement from Gov. David Paterson announced the policy change on behalf of State Health Commissioner Richard F. Daines.

    Daines had originally said that public health workers must be vaccinated for the seasonal flu and the H1N1 virus, also known as swine flu, by November 30 or risk discipline.

    The Public Employees Federation, New York's second-largest state employees union, sued over the requirement and was awaiting a state Supreme Court hearing scheduled for October 30.

    The vaccine shortage has defused the conflict.

    The federal government had told states that, by the end of October, an estimated 120 million doses of the H1N1 vaccine would be readily available, according to Paterson and Daines. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will have only about 27.7 million doses of the vaccine at month's end.

    "The CDC acknowledged that New York would only receive approximately 23 percent of its anticipated vaccine supply," Paterson said. "As a result, we need to be as resourceful as we can with the limited supplies of vaccine currently coming into the state."

    Those particularly at risk, and who are at the forefront of receiving both the seasonal flu and the H1N1 vaccines, are pregnant women and people 6 months to 24 years old, the news release said.

    The CDC has revised its H1N1 vaccine goal. It had planned to have 200 million doses of the H1N1 vaccine by the end of November, but it now aims for 65.9 million doses nationwide.

    The CDC also recently reported that increased demand has led to a shortage of the seasonal flu vaccine, according to Paterson's statement.

Where Are the Vaccine Pied Pipers Leading Us?

This is a lengthy but informative read. Please read all of it.

    Bill Sardi -

    Wired.com, that Conde Nast online publication that caters to techy people, has published a wave of articles critical of those who oppose massive over-vaccination of the American population.

    These articles declare those individuals who oppose mass vaccination to be "misinformants." Celebrities like Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey, Don Imus and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who openly oppose submission to mass vaccination, are belittled. These articles claim those who don’t get vaccinated are endangering everybody else.

    Here are the provoking headlines of those wired.com articles:

    These wired.com articles are written by skilled writers and they make strong though narrow arguments. The second title, "How to win an argument about vaccines" suggests those who oppose vaccination are irrational and ill informed and their thinking needs to be changed by those of superior intelligence.

    The war is not vaccines versus alternatives, but is characterized as science versus pseudoscience. The authors of the wired.com reports haven’t the brainpower or critical thinking to question the twelve published studies that conclude vaccines don’t cause autism. What matters is that their god of science has been challenged. And there may be nothing wrong with those studies, it’s just that the vaccine proponents aren’t looking outside the box, about questions that aren’t being asked but should be.

    Here is how reporter Amy Wallace poses the battle:

    "And finally, the so called ‘bogus’ treatments for autism don’t exist in opposition to scientific treatments, they exist because of an absence of scientific treatments. There is no cure and as of yet, no known cause for autism. The medical community is still working out how to even test kids for autism. How can you possibly fault a parent for being fearful and wanting to help their child and using whatever method is available to them. Every disease has gone through this phase, before cancer had a clear cut medical approach to treatment people tried all sorts of treatments that we now consider scientifically unsound."


    Of course there are no cures for cancer either. Cancer treatment results in a faster demise of the patient. So the example provided here is flawed.

    Recognize that vaccines, antibiotics and anti-flu drugs are driving humanity towards a box canyon. Eventually there will be no antibiotics, vaccines or man-made drugs that germs haven’t developed resistance towards. Follow these vaccine pied pipers and there will be a day when billions of people die of needless plagues because of over-reliance upon vaccines.

    When that day comes, humanity will be using remedies that are now being ridiculed by the proponents of vaccines – vitamin D, vitamin C, the trace mineral selenium and extracts from oregano (carvacrol), garlic (allicin) and grape skins (resveratrol, quercetin) to quell future epidemics without treatment resistance.

    Amy Wallace recounts here experience at an anti-vaccine conference:

    "To a one, the speakers told parents not to despair. Vitamin D would help, said one doctor and supplement salesman who projected the equation "No vaccines + more vitamin d = no autism" onto a huge screen during his presentation. (If only it were that simple.) Others talked of the powers of enzymes, enemas, infrared saunas, glutathione drips, chelation therapy…"

    Yes, we who oppose unquestioned vaccination want good scientific underpinnings behind treatments for infectious disease too. It just depends upon what science you are reading.

    How about "Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage," recently published in the journal Nature Review Immunology (Sept 2008 8(9):685–98), written by researchers at Harvard Medical School.

    Vaccine inventor Paul Offit calls advocates for these natural remedies "autisms false prophets," and wrote a book with the same title. He says any remedies that currently exist are promoted by a dangerous "cottage industry of false hope."

What’s in the closet?

Modern medicine wouldn’t be hiding any of its vaccine mistakes in the closet, would it? Uh, think again, a vaccination program in 1993 was so lethal that it set back the life expectancy of Americans for the first time since the 1918 Spanish flu, but it was completely white-washed – never even reported. (See here.)

As you read my rebuttal to the vaccine cartel here, you should not be intimidated by scientists or doctors who claim to know more than you do. I’m going to take you on a short course to examine some recent research studies for yourself. You can click on the links to read the abstracts of these studies.

Researchers at the University of Minnesota note that prenatal viral infection is associated with the development of schizophrenia and autism. These researchers took laboratory mice and exposed them to flu viruses in the womb and found that this produced a gene expression pattern consistent with what is seen in autism. [Schizophrenia Research 2009 Jul; 112(1–3):46–53.]

In 2005 the same researchers showed, for the first time, that prenatal flu virus infection in early pregnancy leads to "alterations in a subset of genes in brains of offspring potentially leading to permanent changes in brain structure and function." [Synapse. 2005 Aug; 57(2):91–9.]

Here is what the mouse brain looks like after it has been exposed to the flu virus in the womb. The brains of flu-infected mice are shrinking (atrophy – red and yellow).

MRI imaging reveals significant brain atrophy (shrinkage) in multiple brain areas of the 35-day-old virally infected mouse offspring (right panel) as compared to sham infected mice (left panel).

From the same study, examine the tremendous difference in brain chemicals (called neurotransmitters) between flu-infected and uninfected laboratory mice. [Schizophrenia Research 2008 Feb; 99(1–3):56–70.]

Neurotransmitter Content in micromole/ gram Protein

CONTROLS

VIRALLY EXPOSED

BRAIN CHEMICALS

P0

P14

P35

P56

P0

P14

P35

P56

Dopamine

14.2

5.8

1.1

1.0

15.9

3.2

1.0,P14

1.2

3, 4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid

2.4

2.0

5.0

4.3

2.7

1.2

4.3

4.5

Serotonin

56.5

51.8

73.2

70.2

56.1

37.8

62.0

61.1

5-hydroxy indole acetic acid

351.8

103.6

57.1

37.9

299

74.6

49.2

42.6

Glutamate

39.3

61.8

76.6

75.8

47.8

64.3

68.6

76.2

Glutamine

57.9

40.1

39.2

37.1

56.2

38.6

30.5

36.6

Gamma amino butyric acid

22.4

24.8

24.1

19.8

24.5

20.3

16.9

20.9

Taurine

424.2

145.36

59.5

60.0

277.8

139.4

47.6

60.8

This science is being inappropriately used to target pregnant women for early flu vaccination. I wrote these researchers, saying their studies are a tacit admission that vaccines could potentially induce brain disorders in the womb since the vaccines ARE the virus, or at least less active forms of the flu virus (the nasally-instilled flu vaccine IS the "live" virus). Show the public the gene expression patterns in fetal mice exposed to the flu vaccine. This is an experiment they don’t conduct.

The modern-day puzzle of disease

Few investigators put together pieces of the modern puzzle to notice that the upsurge of autism occurred concurrently with an increase in rates of vaccination and a rise in antibiotic resistance as well as greater number of children suffering from asthma, diabetes, gluten intolerance and celiac disease as well as autism. These were largely unheard of decades ago.

Recognition of the germ theory of disease is growing. Cancer, diabetes, heart disease and age-related brain disease have all been linked to bacteria and viruses.

The origin of autism

After a review of the scientific literature, I maintain autism is a brain infection. These other diseases, childhood diabetes, asthma, etc., also have links to germs.

Vaccines ARE a little bit of infectious disease, employed to trigger an immune response. To gain a better understanding of the full picture here, read my online book The Hidden Epidemic, available here for free download.

The Hidden Epidemic explains the history of autism is rooted in childhood schizophrenia, which is what autism was called in an earlier era. There is unequivocal data to show cases of schizophrenia are caused by infection. So why not autism?

Now here is the scientific world reporting more and more young children are becoming mentally withdrawn and unstable, yet the scientists haven’t a clue what is causing this phenomenon. But they are sure it isn’t vaccines. Vaccines subject children to a little bit of disease, often before they have a fully developed immune system and blood-brain barrier.

Smug and arrogant scientific dogma

So be good boys and girls and don’t question the scientific elitists who tell you what is good for your children and what isn’t. You are all like dumb uneducated people living in huts in some backward country. What could you possibly know anyway?

Wired.com reporter Wallace says "the doubters and deniers are empowered by the Internet (online, nobody knows you’re not a doctor) and helped by the mainstream media, which has an interest in pumping up bad science to create a "debate" where there should be none." Shall we let Wallace do all the thinking for us?

After all, those who don’t vaccinate their kids endanger all the rest of us, that is if you buy into what Amy Wallace says in her column entitled: "How Panicked Parents Skipping Shots Endangers Us All."

Even researchers at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta concede that "effectiveness of currently licensed vaccines in the United States is about 30–50% in preventing complications arising from influenza and preventing death from all causes during winter months in older adults." [Current Topics Microbiology Immunology 2009;333:413–29]

If humanity totally relies upon ineffective vaccines, we are doomed to be vulnerable to every plague that passes by.

What IS endangering us all is treatment for the flu. Flawed treatment appears to have caused most of the flu-related death over the past decades since the Spanish flu of 1918. In fact, it appears more flu deaths result from treatment than the disease itself. See here.

The context of Wallace’s column is the growing number of parents who aren’t submitting their children for flu vaccination this season. What Wallace fails to examine is that there is no strong evidence to show that vaccines prevent flu-related death.

Yes, vaccines have saved lives, but the technology is archaic. It is 1798 cow pox know-how, first implemented by Dr. Edward Jenner. It has seen its day. Many of the vaccines wouldn’t even be needed if the world had clean water, public hygiene, clean foods and better nutrition. Immunity is weak in the malnourished. Vaccines aren’t an appropriate answer to this problem.

We enter a new era – that of mobilizing the human immune system against disease. Undernutrition or malnutrition adversely affects defenses against many invading microorganisms, which increases the severity of infection. Studies have shown that selenium or vitamin E deficiency in mice increases disease severity when animals are infected with influenza virus. [Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007 Aug 15;45(4):470–4] Nutritional status has been called "the neglected virulence factor." [Trends Microbiology 2004 Sep;12(9):417–23] Why are we trying to rescue people from the doorstep of death with vaccines before we correct underlying nutritional imbalances?

Blocking communicable disease

Where are all these communicable diseases coming from that require a plethora of vaccines? America needs to practice preventive medicine by screening entrants into the country. Whooping cough, hepatitis and tuberculosis travel over the border in large numbers every day and there is no public health screening program, not even in schools or food establishments where immigrant children and workers abound. We are allowing disease to be spread to create a larger market for the vaccines.

We permit unclean foods to reach the market, contaminated with runoff of animal feces that harbor E. coli, Salmonella, etc., and we permit 2.5% of milk cartons to reach the store shelf that harbor paratuberculosis. Then we try to block these infections with vaccines. It’s insane.

Recognize, Japan doesn’t accept American food products because health authorities there know the American food chain is contaminated with Campylobacter (chicken), Salmonella (chicken, cheese), E. Coli (red meat) and paratuberculosis (milk).

Between unscreened immigrants who enter the country harboring infectious disease and unclean food that is ubiquitous in the food chain, America has become a cooking pot for communicable disease. Vaccines have become the cure all.

Flawed thinking: Infectious disease is a vaccine deficiency

The idea of a vaccine for every communicable disease is not something the human body was designed to withstand. When we subject children to the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, Rubella) we give them a little bit of three diseases, or at least the immune response to three diseases, all at once. Pediarix is a new 5-in-one combination vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and polio. Seasonal flu shots subject a person to three strains of the flu all at one time.

By the way, since when does staying healthy require a sacrifice at the temple of modern medicine? People living in many rural areas and backwards countries live longer and healthier, with very low rates of cancer and autism, without doctoring. Is health maintenance beyond the intellect of the average American? Are we allowed to stay healthy without vaccination and drugs? Or this no longer permitted?

The scary part of vaccine-inventor Offit’s rationale for mass vaccination is that he actually believes in medical fascism. Here is how Offit says it:

"We have seat belt rules," he says. "Seat belts save lives. There was never a question about that. The data was absolutely clear. But people didn’t use them until they were required to use them. Unless you fly through the window and hit somebody else," he adds. "I believe in mandates. I do."

There you have it, with a few million bucks for Offit to pocket to boot. Line your children up now and submit them be inoculated with 48 doses of 14 different vaccines before the age of 6. Never mind to question any of this. You are too ill-informed to even ask intelligent questions. Just do what you are told.

Not to worry. Forced vaccination is politically unpalatable. They will think of lacing the vaccines in your Kool Aid. Edible vaccines are actually under development. [Advanced Drug Delivery Review 2006 Apr 20; 58(1):68–89]

You won’t even know you were vaccinated.

October 23, 2009


Brooklyn Mumps Outbreak

Doesn't one of the "M"s in the MMR vaccine stand for "mumps"? How can there be a mumps outbreak in Brooklyn - 57 reported cases - when these children were vaccinated against it? Someone's got some 'splainin to do.

Social services 'to take baby from teenager deemed too stupid to marry'

This story comes from the UK, but make no mistake: eugenics is a global agenda and as soon as conditions exist for this to occur in America, it will. But modern eugenics has moved beyond social hygiene methods such as selective breeding; they just want to wipe us all out indiscriminately. What this represents is the effort to beat us down and accept the fact that we and our children are property of the State. They'll do with us as they please - eventually killing us - and there is nothing we can do about it. We should accept and embrace this fate.

    London Telegraph -

    Kerry Robertson, 17, who has mild learning difficulties, has been told that she will not be allowed to bring up her own child, who she has already named Ben.

    Last month Miss Robertson was prevented from marrying her fiancé Mark McDougall, 25, after council officials claimed that she “did not understand the implications of getting married”.

    She has now been warned that she will only be allowed a few hours with her baby, which is due in January, before it is taken into foster care.

    After hearing the news, Miss Robertson, of Dunfermline, Fife, who is 26 weeks pregnant, said: “I couldn't believe it. I am so upset – I can't stop crying.”

    Mr McDougall, an artist, said he wants to take on full responsibility for his son but claims that he is powerless because he is not married to Miss Robertson.

    He added: “Social Services are ruining our lives. As we are not married – because social workers would not let us marry – it seems I have no rights as a dad at all.

    “Kerry's gran is trying to apply for custody of Ben but social services have already told us it is unlikely she will be successful. We feel helpless.”

    The extraordinary case first came to light last month when the couple’s wedding was halted 48 hours before Miss Robertson was due to walk up the aisle.

    Under Scottish law, a registrar may refuse to marry a couple if they believe one or both the parties lack the mental capacity to understand what the institution of marriage is about.

    In a highly unusual step, Dunfermline Register Office refused to sanction the marriage after Fife council wrote a letter of objection.

    Miss Robertson was brought up by her grandmother from the age of nine months because her parents were unable to look after her and her welfare has since been overseen by the council’s social workers.

    She met Mr McDougall, from Arbroath, in January and the couple planned to get married after Miss Robertson became pregnant.

    Two days before the ceremony, two social workers visited their flat and told them that the marriage was illegal because of Miss Robertson’s learning difficulties.

    The service and reception for 20 guests had to be called off despite the couple having already bought rings and a wedding dress.

    At the time, Miss Robertson said: “I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together. I love Mark and I want to get married to him.”

    Mr McDougall added: “Despite arguing that we loved one another and didn't want our baby to be born to unwed parents, they would not budge. It's a nightmare.”

    He claims that social services have exaggerated the extent of Miss Robertson’s learning difficulties and that she is hoping to go back to college to catch up academically.

    The council said it does not comment on individual cases. But Stephen Moore, the council's executive director of social services, said: “Much of the work we do is governed by legislation. Complex decisions are made that balance risk and welfare while supporting people at times of personal or family need.

    "We will always work with people for the best outcome for all involved.”

    In May it was disclosed that Rachel Pullen, 24, had her three-year-old daughter taken away from her by social services when she was six months old after Nottingham City Council officials deemed her too stupid to look after the child.

Serious adverse reactions, deaths in Sweden from swine flu vaccine

You know these are occurring in America, but the media will never report on them. And when they leak out anyway, of course, it will not be the fault of vaccines. The vaccines are never to blame. Never. In Sweden, they acknowledge the side effects, but say they're good. Yes, good, because it is a sign that the vaccine is potent. Yes, potent indeed, as a soft-kill weapon and cash cow for big pharma.

    Health Freedom Alliance -

    Yesterday 30 people had been reporting to the authorities in Sweden that they experienced such severe side effects that they felt the need to contact a hospital. Today the number is 140. The swedish newspaper Expressen is the only one in Sweden reporting on these cases and as usual this is most likely only the tip of a rather large iceberg. UPDATE: According to Dagens Nyheter, the number of reported side effects are now a few hours later 190. 1 person dies after the injection but “no direct relation with the injection has been established”. The biggest medical scandal in the history of Sweden has just started.

    Even so, Annika Linde, director of The Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI) manages to spin this into something positive by stating “The vaccine has more side effects than the normal flu vaccine. It is a sign that proves that it gives an effective protection.”

    Thousands of Swedes have been vaccinated so far and the reports of side effects are “flooding in” to The Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI). Annika Linde: “It is obviously so that the vaccine against the swine flu results in more side effects than the normal flu vaccines. That is because the swine flu vaccine contains adjuvants, shark liver oil, which triggers the immune defense to respond. That also results in that the protection against the virus becomes better.”

    Several severe cases of allergic reactions are reported to the unit for medicinal safety. “So far the reported side effects are not unexpected”, says Gunilla Sjölin Forsberg. This unit has now asked some of the many units that vaccinate to report side effects to better get a grip on the situation. This statement alone is shocking since according to normal practice, all side effects should automatically be reported - right?

    A nurse who took the shot on wednesday last week is still feeling sick. She got high fever and shivers from the swine flu shot. “-I was shaking in my whole body. It was so sever that I could not even hold a glass of water in my hand.”, Lotta Lindström says.

    “- I am now thinking about what it is I have been injected with. I really was affected. It feels really unpleasant.”

    De blev sjuka av vaccinet - Hälsa - Expressen.se

    Maria Strindlund is not so sure she made the right choice to tae the shot. She also got a severe fever and shivering reaction. “- Since I work as a nurse, I decided it was the best thing to do.”, she says. At first she felt nothing from the vaccinaton, but a few hours later the side effects kicked in. “- I got a extreme pain in my arm. I could no longer lift it.” The came the fever and the shivering. ” _ I was lying in bed shivering and was feeling very cold and stood in a hot shower to get warm.” She says many colleguse who also took the vaccine have had similar reactons. She has been taking many vaccines in the past without any reactions whatsoever.

    Maria, 27: “Fick fruktansvärt ont” - Hälsa - Expressen.se

    Rebecka Andersson was the first person to get the shot in Sweden. She became feverish and felt sick to her stomach from the shot. ” - I lost all energy”, she says. “-I am normally never sick so I understood it must be the vaccine.” Her class mates was vaccinated at the same time and she states that five out of nineteen also got sick from the swine flu vaccine.

    Rebecka, 32: “Jag blev orkeslös” - Hälsa - Expressen.se

    Lotta Lindström, a nurse, states that she got the shot a week ago and still is not well. “- It feels very worrying”, she says. “- I did not sleep anything the night after the shot since the pain in my arm was so severe.” The day after, at work, the fever came. She later had headaches. She still today, a week after the shot feels sick.

    Lotta, 49: “Jag sov inte något på natten” - Hälsa - Expressen.se

    Another nurse, Jennely, could hardly walk five meters after she got sick from the “swine flu” vaccination. She was completely healthy when she got the shot but the day after she had 39 degrees centigrade fever (102.2 F). “- I could hardly walk the five meters I had to the bathroom”, she says. The fever lasted for three days. sevreal of her colugueges at work had similar experiences. “- I know of at least ten that got fever , we are about 80 people at my workplace.”

    Jennely, 26: “Orkade knappt gå fem meter” - Hälsa - Expressen.se

    Johan Niklasson

    http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1268%3Athey-got-sick-from-the-vaccine-in-sweden&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=en

Neurological vaccines

You gotta hand it to them. It really is ingenious. Evil, but brilliant. They give you neurological disorders by adding neurotoxins in vaccines, water, and food, then provide us with more drugs and vaccines to "treat" these conditions, which they themselves knowingly created.

    NaturalNews -

    There's a new vaccine for nicotine addiction, and another one for drug addiction. There's an AIDS vaccines (which doesn't work) and a vaccine for cervical cancer that's been approved for use on boys (boys don't have a cervix). Through the pharmaceutical industry, the big push for vaccines is on!

    But why, exactly? Is there suddenly a new rash of epidemic disease requiring vaccine treatments? No, not really. What's new is the way Big Pharma is latching on to these diseases as new opportunities to sell more drugs.

    There's a huge shift underway from drugs designed for sick people to a whole new class of drugs manufactured for healthy people. The new paradigm is that people need drugs before they get sick, as a sort of "protection" against sickness. Drugs, in essence, are being positioned as nutrients -- things the human body needs in order to be healthy. And from the moment you're born, you're considered deficient in these drugs. That's why babies are injected with vaccines within minutes after being born. There's a strong belief in the medical industry that babies are born deficient in vaccines and that such deficiencies must be "corrected" as soon as possible.

    This simple but powerful shift in the marketing strategy of Big Pharma has expanded the potential customer based from a subset of the population (people who are sick) to the entire world population. Now, everybody needs a vaccine for something say the drug companies. All that's necessary for the financial success of these scheme is to convince sick people that they need more drugs (or vaccines), and that's easily accomplished through disease mongering campaigns (like the current fear push over H1N1 swine flu).

    Bypassing the need for scientific evidence

    There's another important shift taking place alongside the big vaccine push: A shift away from "evidence-based medicine" to a new medical paradigm of "dogmatic belief."

    Medicines that treat sick people, you see, have to be proven to work. There have to be clinical trials, and some percentage of those sick people (only 5% or so, typically) have to show some sort of improved response after taking the medicine. This is the so-called "gold standard" of modern medicine. But with vaccines, no proof of efficacy is required. No placebo-controlled studies need to be conducted at all. Vaccines can be openly marketed and prescribed without any evidence that they actually work.

    This is the new "free pass" for Big Pharma -- a class of medicine that requires no proof! They merely need to be injected into a few hundred people who are observed for as little as two weeks to see if anybody died or collapses into a coma. That's all the testing that's required (and sometimes even less). No long-term safety tests are required or pursued, and, importantly, there is no requirement that the vaccine proves it actually works to reduce flu infections (or HPV infections, etc.).

    In essence, by pushing for a vaccine approach to virtually everything, including nicotine addictions, the pharmaceutical industry has transformed itself from a small industry that only served sick people with scientifically-proven medicines to a huge global industry that sells vaccines to everyone and needs no proof that they even work. By any assessment, it's a brilliant strategy for increasing pharmaceutical profits.

    Free registration is required to read the rest of this article...

FDA, FTC threaten Dr. Weil over immune-boosting supplements for H1N1 swine flu

You don't question the official orthodoxy, which says that only modern medicine - government approved modern medicine - can keep you healthy. You're not smart enough to know what's good for you, and anyone who tries to tell you there are other methods besides what the government - infested with lobbyists for big pharma - that can keep you well is an enemy of the State. Maybe a potential terrorist. Very scary.

    NaturalNews -

    In working to protect the business interests of vaccine manufactures, both the FDA and FTC have declared all-out war against any products that might offer consumers options other than vaccines. This week, that war against natural remedies reached the shores of Dr. Andrew Weil, who is perhaps the best-known alternative medicine doctor in America. In an intimidating, threatening letter jointly issued by the FTC and the FDA, these rogue government agencies threatened Dr. Weil with criminal prosecution for making true statements about his immune-boosting formula such as, "Astragalus ... is ... used traditionally to ward off colds and flu, and has demonstrated both antiviral and immune-boosting effects in scientific investigation."

    This statement, although scientifically valid and true, is a threat to the profits of the vaccine industry, and so Dr. Weil's company is being targeted by the FTC / FDA vaccine racket tag-team for termination.

    You can review the FTC threats against Dr. Weil on the FTC's own website: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Enforcemen...

    Some of the threats leveled against Dr. Weil by the FTC include:

    • Forcing Dr. Weil's company to refund ALL customers who purchased his immune support formula. (For no apparent reason other than to burden his company with such costs.)

    • Subjecting Dr. Weil's company with "legal action in the form of a Federal District Court injunction or Administrative Order."

    • Gunpoint seizure of ALL of Dr. Weil's nutritional products: "If your firm fails to take corrective action immediately, FDA may take enforcement action, such as seizure or injunction for violations of the FFDC Act without further notice."

    • Subjecting Dr. Weil and his company to criminal prosecution: "Firms that fail to take corrective action may also be referred to FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations for possible criminal prosecution for violations of the FFDC Act and other federal laws."

    • Adding Dr. Weil's company to a list of companies that have been found in "violation" of the FFDC Act.

    These threats are signed by the top fearmongers running the censorship racket at both the FTC and FDA:

    Mary K. Engle
    Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices
    Federal Trade Commission

    Roberta F. Wagner
    Director, Office of Compliance
    Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
    Food and Drug Administration


    Do you now see what a criminal racket the vaccine industry is running in America by invoking these tactics of tyranny? This is the kind of thing you might expect to see in China, where government officials arrest Falun Gong members who attempt to meditate in public, but you wouldn't think that in the United States of America -- "Land of the Free" -- you'd be threatened with arrest and financial ruin for simply telling the truth about a powerful herb with scientifically-validated medicinal properties.

    The FTC's dangerous double standard

    This FTC / FDA letter claims Dr. Weil has been promoting his immune-boosting formula "...without rigorous scientific evidence sufficient to substantiate the claims."

    This might be taken with some level of seriousness if, in fact, the vaccine makers had any such evidence to substantiate their own claims that flu vaccines work at all. But as NaturalNews readers have already learned, flu vaccines are a scientific hoax lacking any honest evidence that they actually work. In fact, all the evidence points to the reality that they don't work. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027239_v...)

    Free registration is required to read the rest of this article..