It's that time of year again, and the individual can hardly drive half a block without passing a pharmacy or doctor's office offering flu shots, usually in a presentation that makes it seem like vaccines are hard to come by and, boy, aren't you lucky we've got them! Hurry up and get jabbed before they disappear forever!
The notion, which I am quite happy to propagate, that vaccines do nothing to cure or prevent illnesses, and are utterly worthless except for dumbing people down and wrecking their immune systems, really gets the flock into a tizzy. The American indoctrination process includes a heavy dose of authority worship, and when it comes to your health and well-being, the man or woman in the white coat is God.
But when one does their own digging, and applies their own intelligence and common sense - if it hasn't been chemically-lobotomized out of you - one sees that things are not what they seem when it comes to "modern" medical "science".
For myself, the road to discovery regarding vaccines traveled via sodium fluoride. This is instrumental in how I view what comes out of the establishment, so indulge me a moment while I explain the correlation between fluoride and vaccines.
Water fluoridation is one of the most heinous crimes against humanity of all time, and it is being championed by the American government. When the government tells you fluoride is needed in water and in toothpaste for dental health, keep in mind that it was Stalin who first introduced sodium fluoride into the water in the gulags, and later Hitler in his death camps. It is irrefutable historic fact that this was done so prisoners would become placid and dumbed down, and lack the will to resist.
Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty. - Charles Perkins
Sodium fluoride is also the main active toxin in rat poisons and pesticides. It is now known to cause lower IQ, leukemia, osteosarcoma, and sterilization. It damages the thyroid gland, causing cardiac disease, high cholesterol, depression and, in pregnant women, decreased intelligence in their children. It attacks the pineal gland, altering melatonin production effecting sexual maturation, calcium metabolism, parathyroid function, postmenopausal osteoporosis, cancer, and psychiatric disease. It is a compulsory medication, found in drinking water, toothpaste, vitamins, and liquid cold medications; Scientific American reported in January 2008 that it is literally impossible not to over-medicate yourself on it.
Sodium fluoride is a carcinogenic industrial waste product, mainly from aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate fertilizer, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Rather than improve dental health, fluoride weakens and stains our teeth. It is a grotesque substance that no living being should ingest, and certainly should not be forced to ingest by having our water contaminated by it. If fluoride is good for us, why is there a warning on your toothpaste to call the poison control center if you swallow even a small amount of it? Nearly all of Western Europe has banned water fluoridation, and their toothpastes have half the level of fluoride American products do, yet their dental health is markedly superior to Americans.
It is from this frame of reference that I present to you the vaccine fraud. Vaccines today are a sacred (cash) cow, a modern medical "miracle" without which we'd all be crippled, dead, or worse. Anyone who suggests they might be the cause of autism, ADD, ADHD, Alzheimer's, and a plethora of auto-immune disorders is annihilated by the establishment.
At this point you may be trying to rationalize the whole thing, something along the lines of, just because they dump fluoride in our water doesn't mean the vaccines are bad. No, of course not. But if they'd dump sodium fluoride in our water, it shouldn't be beyond the realm of possibility that they've completely lied about the vaccines. And lie they have.
Vaccine ingredients contain what can reasonably be described as a Nazi experiment, including mercury, aluminum, ethylene glycol (anti-freeze), chemical detergents, formaldehyde, foreign recombinant RNA including aborted fetal retinal tissue and cancer cells from monkeys, and poly-sorbate 80, or preen 80, a known sterilant – all entering your body in an unnatural fashion (injection) for which your body has little ability to defend against. If this seems absurd to you, compare this list to any vaccine insert, if you can convince a pharmacist to actually let you look at one.
Particularly in children, who have weakened blood-brain barriers, these toxic substances, including violent neurotoxins (which, in the case of mercury, have recently been declared by establishment medicine, reported by establishment media, as beneficial to children with developing brains), wreak havoc on the brain, and often overheat the immune system causing violent autoimmune responses (such as vaccine induced encephalitis (“shaken baby syndrome”)) and immune disorders that make them pharma clients for life.
The whole concept of vaccination was developed by Edward Jenner, an 18th century English doctor who based his entire theory on an old wives' tale that people who came down with cowpox were somehow immune to smallpox. Testing this theory in May of 1796, he removed fluid from a woman's cowpox lesion and injected it into the arm of a healthy 8 year old boy. Jenner then later injected the boy with smallpox. When the boy did not get smallpox, Jenner concluded, "The cowpox protects the human constitution from the infection of smallpox." That's it. That's what the entire science is based on - this wholly unscientific test.
Common sense tells us that not everyone who ever came into contact with smallpox became symptomatic, else the overwhelming majority of humanity would've been afflicted. Jenner's finding was published in 6 languages and, again, is the basis for an entire industry of vaccine producing pharmaceutical companies who reap in billions off it.
Is it not, therefore, rather strange, Mr. President, that vaccination should be reported as so utterly harmless in the distant Philippines, where we can not easily get at the records, when we know it is so deadly in the nearby England and America, where the accessible records show that it causes, frequently, more deaths than smallpox, as I have already proved? For example: the great English Commission on Vaccination found that deaths from vaccination were sometimes as high as seventy deaths per million vaccinated. This is twice as high as the mortality from smallpox in the United States, which for five years, from 1901 to 1905, including our last great epidemic period of 1901 and 1902, averaged only thirty-four deaths per million population! - Charles M Higgins
However, even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day, so could it be possible that Jenner stumbled onto a concept that, with further scientific research and technological tweaking, developed into a viable medical procedure? Of course. Is that the case? No. Some more history to put this into context.
Smallpox made its appearance in the midst of the collapse of Greek and Roman civilization, with their high standards of health, hygiene, and sanitation: public baths, municipal water supply, drainage, toilets, garbage disposal, spacious, well-aired, sun-drenched living quarters, and a simple, un-spoiled diet. These factors prevented smallpox from ravaging their populations at the same time it devastated Africa and Asia. How?
During the Dark Ages in Europe, sanitation, diet, and hygiene were frightfully inadequate. Noted hygienist and dietician Doctor Herbert Shelton describes the conditions:
According to Montgomery’s English History, the streets of London and other cities were rarely more than twelve to fifteen feet wide were neither paved nor lighted. Pools of stagnant water accumulated everywhere, heaps of garbage abounded and were only removed when it began to obstruct the traffic. There was no sewage and dead dogs, cats, rubbish, rotten vegetable and fruit refuse, human and animal excreta, and slops from the kitchen were all thrown into the streets. Surrounded by high walls, cities could not expand and people were forced to live in a slum-like manner. Holes served as windows, with little or no ventilation, whole families slept in one room often in one bed, and hundreds of persons lived in one building crowded in from the sub-celler to the attic. They rarely ever washed, had no bath tubs, no underwear and wore the same clothes day and night. They lived in utmost poverty, slaved long hours, even the children worked, drank heavily of alcohol, ate like hogs of spoiled, unnatural food and suffered from malnutrition.
So we see two cultural contrasts where disease was non-existant in one and rampant in the other. Did vaccines exist in Greece and Rome? But without them, how were they spared the ravages of this disease? Certainly the Roman Empire, which controlled vast portions of Africa and Asia, was not quarantined from the rest of the world. There was one simple factor involved: standard of living.
Examination of almost all statistical data regarding diseases and vaccination show that the vaccine had little to no measurable effect on reducing illness, and in some cases actually contributed to an increase of deaths from the disease - in other words, people were killed by the very disease they were vaccinated against, and they contracted the disease from the vaccination. The most glaring example can be seen below, as documented by Dr. Raymond Obomsawin, president of the Circle of Nations Institute of Life Sciences and Sustainable Development:
We are told that among the greater miracles of science and in vaccination is Jonas Salk's polio vaccine. Yet over fifty years later, in August of this year, we find that the vaccine is only effective at infecting people with the very virus they are told the vaccine would protect them from. What, exactly, do people expect when they're given a live polio virus? Further, even if Salk's vaccine were effective in eradicating polio in the United States, a cancer-causing monkey virus, SV40, found in polio vaccines prior to 1963, is now known to have caused non-Hodkings lymphoma in millions of people. Why was this separate virus found in the vaccine? Well, that's an entirely separate, albeit entirely relevant subject.
What about measles, mumps, rubella, and all these other diseases we vaccinate our children against? I present the following charts documenting not only that vaccines did not eradicate disease, but have contributed to high infant mortality, mental disorders, SIDS, and shaken baby syndrome, among other conditions. Click each chart to enlarge and be sure to note the sources.
Examining these statistics, I state that it is obvious vaccines do not prevent disease on any measurable level. But if vaccines don't prevent disease, what effects are they having on our children?
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. - Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society p50, 1953
Let's for a moment forget there are people out there who are "experts" and that you're supposedly not one of them, and apply our own common sense. Mercury is one of the most powerful neurotoxins known to man. It literally obliterates neurons. The label of thimerisol - the mercury-based "preservative" found in vaccines - has a skull and crossbones on it, and says it is "very toxic".
Our bodies have defense mechanisms for filtering out toxins that we ingest naturally - either through breathing, eating and drinking, or absorption through our pores. Some of them will seep into the bloodstream; some of it will be released through our urine or feces. The body has little to defend itself against toxins injected directly into the bloodstream, as this method of entry is completely unnatural.
These toxins - and thimerisol/mercury is not the only toxin contained in vaccines - are pumped directly into our soft tissue and blood stream, and there is nothing to stop them from ending up in our brain and other vital organs. It has a cumulative effect on these organs - in the case of neurological disorders, the brain - meaning it collects in the brain and continues to do damage for periods of time after it is injected.
How can anyone seriously say, with a straight face, that injecting a vicious and potent neurotoxin directly into the blood of children with developing brains will not seriously damage their nervous system? Just how stupid do they believe we are? Extremely, apparently. Particularly since a lobotomy effect is a primary purpose of vaccines in general and mercury in particular.
Despite all of the obvious implications mercury in vaccines have on our brains, particularly children's but also adults, the government continues to insist that it is safe. In fact they tell us it's beneficial to pregnant women and children with developing brains. If you believe that, you deserve to be lobotomized.
This is the true horror of vaccines: not only are they extraordinarily harmful to our minds and our immune systems, but they are entirely unnecessary. Ask yourself: how do you know vaccines are beneficial? Because your doctor tells you so? Well how does he/she know? Who told them? I submit to you that, as corporatism wraps its tentacles around every essential institution of our society, that, in the case of modern medicine, those who practice in it unwittingly serve the corporate interests which control it. Who owns and funds the medical societies and journals who define what's "cutting edge"? The curricula at most medical schools are written by pharmaceutical giants; your doctor is almost certainly nothing more than a low-level drug pusher for pharma kingpins.
It should never be far from your mind when considering a doctor's advice that it is the law that only an FDA-approved substance can cure or treat any disease. So it is therefore illegal for your doctor to, for instance, advise you to take Vitamin D3 to boost your immune system, which would make vaccines unnecessary. Why are we less apt to get sick in the summer? Is it because we don't come into contact with viruses? No. It's because the sun is more dominant than in winter months, our skin is more exposed to it as we bask in its warmth, and our bodies use sunlight to create Vitamin D3, which it further uses to create anti-microbial peptides which annihilate invasive viruses and bacteria. This is also why they obsess over exposure to sunlight. Sunlight = health = no profitability for the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
The entire medical industry is based on people's desperation to find a counterbalance for their grotesquely unhealthy lifestyles. They want to be able to eat McDonalds five times a week and take a pill or a shot to keep that non-food from devastating their bodies. It is the personification of sloth and gluttony. Your body is armed by 4 billion years of evolution against the worst nature has to offer. If you eat properly, drink enough water, get enough sleep, and avoid, as often as possible, exposure to harmful electromagnetic fields, industrial chemicals, detergents, and soaps, etc - or, in other words, everything that we've come to rely on that our ancestors, who almost never died of cancer, didn't have - there is hardly a need for "medicine" and certainly no need for vaccines, even if they did work, even if they didn't wreck your immune system and damage your brain.
Let thy food be thy medicine and thy medicine be thy food. - Hippocrates
Your body, and your children's health, are your responsibility alone. It is up to you not to proxy out your health to people who may not have the best intentions or the proper training, despite the fact they are so exalted and despite the hundreds of thousands of dollars and years in school they spent learning nothing of real use except to corporate interests.
This responsibility, of course, if you are so moved, also includes making sure everything you've just read isn't disinformation. You've got to do your own thinking, and rely on your own intelligence, to make the right decisions. The ultimate purpose of this essay is to put you on a path to discovery, as opposed to miring in blind faith. And if you do so and find my research and conclusions wanting, that is your prerogative. I think nothing less of you. Godspeed.
