EPA Threatens “Command-and-Control” Economy to Push Climate Agenda

How do you not stand aghast at the flagrant tyranny bombarding us from this, our government, on a daily basis? How do these so-called "patriots" insist America is the greatest country on Earth, the shining city on a hill? Not when its people enslave themselves and love their bondage.

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
December 9, 2009

The Environmental Protection Agency’s recent declaration that the life-sustaining gas carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant is part of an effort to establish “command-and-control” role for government. EPA boss Lisa Jackson declared carbon dioxide dangerous prior to her scheduled appearance at the Copenhagen climate summit in Denmark.

Command-and-control is a military term defined as the exercise of authority and direction by a designated commanding officer over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. In the case of the EPA, the mission is to impose the globalist climate change agenda on the United States.

EPA boss Jackson announces carbon dioxide is a pollutant.

More specifically, the EPA threat to impose a military-style command-and-control over the economy is an effort to force congressional action on the climate change agenda.

EPA states that it will not wait for an agreement in Copenhagen and action on climate change legislation in Congress. Proposed legislation that passed the House is currently on hold in the Senate.

The agency, established by Richard Nixon and Congress in 1970 with 18,000 full-time employees, will intervene directly in the economy, according to an official.

“If you don’t pass this legislation, then … the EPA is going to have to regulate in this area,” the official announced. “And it is not going to be able to regulate on a market-based way, so it’s going to have to regulate in a command-and-control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty.” The EPA official warned that the EPA’s intervention will be a huge “deterrent to investment” and will inflict injury on an already damaged economy.

Critics of the Obama administration and the EPA say such directives from on-high represent a move toward socialism. In fact, the EPA’s dictatorial edict is more evidence that the government is colluding with the “powers of financial capitalism,” as Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University described the global elite, who are working to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. “This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences,” explained Quigley.

The leak earlier this week of the “Danish text” demonstrates that secret agreements are being hatched behind the scenes at Copenhagen.

Republicans have urged Jackson and the EPA to withdraw the finding on carbon dioxide in light of leaked emails from the Climate Research Unit that reveals how scientists manipulated climate data and threatened skeptics.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., the ranking Republican on the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, said yesterday he is will attend the Copenhagen conference and inform world leaders and climate change commissars that despite any promises made by Obama no new laws will be passed in the United States until the “scientific fascism” ends. “The U.N. should throw a red flag” on scientists who support the climate change fraud and are attempting to stifle dissent.

Climate change guru and carbon trading opportunist Al Gore told CNN yesterday that the leaked emails do not change the world government and carbon taxation scheme. Gore said the emails were taken “out of context.”

Al Gore attempts to dismiss the CRU emails on CNN.

Appearing on the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Lord Monckton said text of the Copenhagen agreement mandates a globalist power grab on an “unimaginable scale” by a “sinister dictatorship.” Monckton described how a new world government outlined in the treaty would impose a 2% taxation on the GDP of the United States and “close down effectively the economies of the west” and “transfer your jobs to third world countries.”