Food Security Threat: Goverment Set to Ban Public Fishing, Individual Food Production

Get your heirloom seeds now, and, from the look of it, stock up on fishing supplies and, most importantly, guns and ammo. No government worth its salt can allow people to figure out that they can sustain themselves without the State. You must be helpless, you must be dependent, so that you will not bite the hand that feeds you, or if you do, they can simply cut you off.

You would think that, with exploding, out of control deficits, runaway spending and impending inflation, government would encourage its citizens to ween themselves off the teat. But, again, if you figured that out, what use is there for government? Why pay taxes so the government can (theoretically) do for you what you're perfectly capable of doing for yourself? In reality, you must be made to fear what life would be like without government, so you can continue to willingly be robbed; so you'll demand promises of your government they have no intention of keeping. The more dependent you are, the more they control you. It's as simple as that. And this, in a nutshell, is Agenda 21.

Mac Slavo
Infowars -

In yet another example of government overstepping its bounds, the Obama administration is preparing to ban fishing in coastal areas around the country, as well as the Great Lakes and other inland water resources:

This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is “fluid” and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn’t issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.

That’s a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.

“When the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) completed their successful campaign to convince the Ontario government to end one of the best scientifically managed big game hunts in North America (spring bear), the results of their agenda had severe economic impacts on small family businesses and the tourism economy of communities across northern and central Ontario,” said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano.

“Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard working American families and small businesses are being ignored.

“In spite of what we hear daily in the press about the President’s concern for jobs and the economy and contrary to what he stated in the June order creating this process, we have seen no evidence from NOAA or the task force that recreational fishing and related jobs are receiving any priority.”

Banning “recreational” fishing isn’t just an issue of economics, but is a threat to the personal liberty of each individual’s right to produce their own food. And banning fishing is just one of several policy changes the government is looking at.

Read all of it.