Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Behind those pesky, inconvenient autism statistics

Turns out it's not the massive assault on our children by mind-crushing vaccines. It's just a tweak in the data. In fact vaccines are not mentioned once in the entire article. Even if many of these kids don't technically have autism, the fact is mental disorders of one sort or another are exploding. This of course is never addressed in the article. The message here is clear, if you know how to read their propaganda - in this case, lies by omission: autism isn't the epidemic you think it is, and it certainly has nothing to do with the many dozens of vaccines we subject our children to.

What is it about the establishment and vaccines? Are they some sort of sacred cow? Are they a bunch of 10 year olds who can't admit they're wrong?

Or is it something more sinister? Do they know vaccines are frying our children's brains, and is that not the desired effect? I say it is.

    The Atlantic -

    This week, the journal Pediatrics released new statistics compiled by the CDC on the prevalence of autism, boosting the rate from 1 in 150 to 1 in 100. It’s another staggering leap in an apparent epidemic—more than doubling the rate of children diagnosed with autism since 1996. Indeed, over the past dozen years, autism has made sad, steady progress from obscure syndrome to seemingly ubiquitous developmental disorder.

    In every state, our scary autism epidemic fuels walkathons, awareness events, and a proliferation of local chapters of national autism organizations. And across the country, concerned parents whose children aren’t keeping up or seem troublingly different, turn to medical professionals and early childhood educators for evaluation and help. The problems are real.

    But what if the autism statistics are wrong?

    In 1987, the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) began broadening the definition of autism to include not only children for whom socialization is impossible, but also those with varying levels of ability to interact and function. What was once a devastating affliction known simply as “autism” evolved into a “spectrum” of disorders, encompassing everything from profound impairment to far milder challenges. Naturally, this more expansive definition of autism partly explains the exponential increase in diagnoses in recent years.

    But many children whose symptoms significantly differ from classic autism—who belong only on the milder end of the autism spectrum, if they belong anywhere on the spectrum at all—are inaccurately ending up with serious autism diagnoses.

    How does this happen? When doctors drop the a-bomb on a family, it helps to have an action-plan, answers, and ready resources at hand to reassure the frantic parents. Many states offer autism intervention services, but most don’t offer subsidized therapies for children who are falling off of the developmental ladder due to milder disorders—sometimes sensory, sometimes in motor planning or other areas.

    So parents whose kids’ challenges are less severe are often urged to accept a full-fledged autism diagnosis, as otherwise they would lose access to state-funded treatment, and might, down the line, end up ineligible for support services in public school. The result is that the autism statistics grow and grow.

Continue reading...