Thursday, November 19, 2009

More GE Crops Mean More Pesticides

Genetically modified foods are part and parcel of the elite's food-driven genocide. Even in their most benign form, they make you sick. It should go without saying that genetically modified foods increase crop exposure to pesticides, since, duh, that's the primary purpose of GM seeds: to produce crops that are resistant to pesticides and herbicides. You can plaster them with the stuff and only the insects and weeds are supposed to die (as the article notes, nature has the last laugh - the weeds are now resistant to the herbicides). So when mega-billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates laments the ban on GM foods in Africa, you can read between the lines and see what the real intent is.

    Alternet -

    When do we get to officially call the "green revolution" an environmental nightmare?

    More genetically engineered crops means less pesticides are needed, right? That's what the big agricultural biotech companies, like Monsanto, promised. But, a report proves they're wrong. Really wrong.

    First, the report was funded by a coalition of non-governmental organizations including the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Center for Food Safety, the Cornerstone Campaign, Californians for GE-Free Agriculture, Greenpeace International and Rural Advancement Fund International USA.

    They found that GE corn, soybean, and cotton crops have increased the use of weed-killing herbicides in the U.S. by 383 million pounds from 1996 to 2008. Why? Because the idea behind many of the big GE crops is to make them resistant to herbicides, for instance Roundup Ready Soybeans won't be killed if you spray the herbicide Roundup on them. Roundup instead is suppose to kill the weeds around the plant. But, crafty little nature has outsmarted biotech again and now we've got weeds that have become resistant as well. Woops.

    So, maybe the biotech industry shouldn't be making farmers pay through the nose for these seeds, eh? Here's some more info from the report about the pickle farmers are in now, thanks to GE crops:

    The price of GE seeds has risen precipitously in recent years, and the need to make additional herbicide applications in an effort to keep up with resistant weeds is also increasing cash production costs. As an example, corn farmers planting "SmartStax" hybrids in 2010 will spend around $124 per acre for seed, almost three times the cost of conventional corn seed. In addition, new-generation "Roundup Ready" (RR) 2 soybean seed, to be introduced on a widespread basis next year, will cost 42 percent more than the original RR seeds they are displacing.

    "The drastic increase in pesticide use with genetically engineered crops is due primarily to the rapid emergence of weeds resistant to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide," said Dr. Charles Benbrook, report author and chief scientist of The Organic Center. "With glyphosate-resistant weeds now infesting millions of acres, farmers face rising costs coupled with sometimes major yield losses, and the environmental impact of weed management systems will surely rise."

    All of us that support organic farmers could just chuckle and have the last laugh, but Big Ag still dominates the food world and they're also trying to position themselves as the solution to the world's hunger problems (which is of course crap since GE crops also don't increase yields). Of course there are other environmental and health reasons to be wary of increased herbicide use, too. So we need to push back and make sure they don't have the opportunity to prove themselves wrong again, and screw more farmers (and eaters) on the way.

1 comment:

  1. Decades of documented evidence show that agriculture biotechnology is a safe and beneficial technology that contributes to both environmental and economic sustainability. Since 1997, the use of pesticides on global biotech crop acreage has been reduced by 790 million pounds, an 8.8 % reduction. Through biotechnology, more specialized herbicides have been replaced by a smaller number of safer compounds with reduced environmental impacts. Thanks to biotechnology, farmers have adopted no-tillage systems which use herbicidal weed control rather than plowing. The benefits include improved soil health, water retention, reduced runoff, fuel conservation and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. By a reduction in plowing, farmers use less fuel and store additional carbon on the soil. In 2007, this was equivalent to removing 31.2 billion pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or equal to removing around 6.3 million cars from the road for one year. Source- BIO.org

    ReplyDelete